mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improved Bounds for Pure Private Agnostic Learning: Item-Level and User-Level Privacy

arXiv 2407.20640 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2024cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning has made remarkable progress in a wide range of fields. In many scenarios, learning is performed on datasets involving sensitive information, in which privacy protection is essential for learning algorithms. In this work, we study pure private learning in the agnostic model -- a framework reflecting the learning process in practice. We examine the number of users required under item-level (where each user contributes one example) and user-level (where each user contributes multiple examples) privacy and derive several improved upper bounds. For item-level privacy, our algorithm achieves a near optimal bound for general concept classes. We extend this to the user-level setting, rendering a tighter upper bound than the one proved by Ghazi et al. (2023). Lastly, we consider the problem of learning thresholds under user-level privacy and present an algorithm with a nearly tight user complexity.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2024.

Builds on

9 of 34 references.

References · 9

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  2. 2018Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimensioncited by 73
  3. 2020An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online Predictioncited by 63
  4. 2020Learning discrete distributions: user vs item-level privacycited by 41
  5. 2014Sample Complexity Bounds on Differentially Private Learning via Communication Complexitycited by 31
  6. 2020Sample-efficient proper PAC learning with approximate differential privacycited by 29
  7. 2020Closure Properties for Private Classification and Online Predictioncited by 15
  8. 2023User-Level Differential Privacy With Few Examples Per Usercited by 12
  9. 2014Learning Privately with Labeled and Unlabeled Examplescited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.