mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

User-Level Differential Privacy With Few Examples Per User

arXiv 2309.12500 ↗First posted 21 Sep 2023cs.DS cs.CR cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Previous work on user-level differential privacy (DP) [Ghazi et al. NeurIPS 2021, Bun et al. STOC 2023] obtained generic algorithms that work for various learning tasks. However, their focus was on the example-rich regime, where the users have so many examples that each user could themselves solve the problem. In this work we consider the example-scarce regime, where each user has only a few examples, and obtain the following results: 1. For approximate-DP, we give a generic transformation of any item-level DP algorithm to a user-level DP algorithm. Roughly speaking, the latter gives a (multiplicative) savings of Ovarepsilon,δ(√m) in terms of the number of users required for achieving the same utility, where m is the number of examples per user. This algorithm, while recovering most known bounds for specific problems, also gives new bounds, e.g., for PAC learning. 2. For pure-DP, we present a simple technique for adapting the exponential mechanism [McSherry, Talwar FOCS 2007] to the user-level setting. This gives new bounds for a variety of tasks, such as private PAC learning, hypothesis selection, and distribution learning. For some of these problems, we show that our bounds are near-optimal.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2023.

Builds on

16 of 34 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 242
  2. 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 149
  3. 2018Privately Learning High-Dimensional Distributionscited by 104
  4. 2021Learning with User-Level Privacycited by 72
  5. 2019Private Hypothesis Selectioncited by 60
  6. 2020Differentially Private Assouad, Fano, and Le Camcited by 55
  7. 2022Reproducibility in Learningcited by 44
  8. 2023Stability is Stable: Connections between Replicability, Privacy, and Adaptive Generalizationcited by 42
  9. 2020Learning discrete distributions: user vs item-level privacycited by 41
  10. 2020Sample-efficient proper PAC learning with approximate differential privacycited by 29
  11. 2021Tight and Robust Private Mean Estimation with Few Userscited by 26
  12. 2022Discrete Distribution Estimation under User-level Local Differential Privacycited by 17
4 more
  1. 2016Adaptive Learning with Robust Generalization Guaranteescited by 15
  2. 2018The Minimax Learning Rates of Normal and Ising Undirected Graphical Modelscited by 11
  3. 2023On User-Level Private Convex Optimizationcited by 8
  4. 2016Typical Stabilitycited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

12 papers.