mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Littlestone Classes are Privately Online Learnable

arXiv 2106.13513 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.CR cs.DScited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of online classification under a privacy constraint. In this setting a learner observes sequentially a stream of labelled examples (xt, yt), for 1 ≤ t ≤ T, and returns at each iteration t a hypothesis ht which is used to predict the label of each new example xt. The learner's performance is measured by her regret against a known hypothesis class H. We require that the algorithm satisfies the following privacy constraint: the sequence h1, ldots, hT of hypotheses output by the algorithm needs to be an (ε, δ)-differentially private function of the whole input sequence (x1, y1), ldots, (xT, yT). We provide the first non-trivial regret bound for the realizable setting. Specifically, we show that if the class H has constant Littlestone dimension then, given an oblivious sequence of labelled examples, there is a private learner that makes in expectation at most O(log T) mistakes -- comparable to the optimal mistake bound in the non-private case, up to a logarithmic factor. Moreover, for general values of the Littlestone dimension d, the same mistake bound holds but with a doubly-exponential in d factor. A recent line of work has demonstrated a strong connection between classes that are online learnable and those that are differentially-private learnable. Our results strengthen this connection and show that an online learning algorithm can in fact be directly privatized (in the realizable setting). We also discuss an adaptive setting and provide a sublinear regret bound of O(√T).

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2021.

Builds on

17 of 45 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  2. 2018Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimensioncited by 73
  3. 2020An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online Predictioncited by 63
  4. 2014Private Learning and Sanitization: Pure vs. Approximate Differential Privacycited by 62
  5. 2015Differentially Private Release and Learning of Threshold Functionscited by 58
  6. 2015Algorithms for Differentially Private Multi-Armed Banditscited by 44
  7. 2017The Price of Differential Privacy For Online Learningcited by 44
  8. 2015Simultaneous Private Learning of Multiple Conceptscited by 34
  9. 2014Sample Complexity Bounds on Differentially Private Learning via Communication Complexitycited by 31
  10. 2019Privately Learning Thresholds: Closing the Exponential Gapcited by 30
  11. 2020Sample-efficient proper PAC learning with approximate differential privacycited by 29
  12. 2017Achieving Privacy in the Adversarial Multi-Armed Banditcited by 24
5 more
  1. 2021Online Learning with Simple Predictors and a Combinatorial Characterization of Minimax in 0/1 Gamescited by 18
  2. 2019Private Center Points and Learning of Halfspacescited by 13
  3. 2020Private Learning of Halfspaces: Simplifying the Construction and Reducing the Sample Complexitycited by 8
  4. 2020How to Find a Point in the Convex Hull Privatelycited by 5
  5. 2020Projection-Free Bandit Optimization with Privacy Guaranteescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

10 papers.