mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

User-Level Private Learning via Correlated Sampling

arXiv 2110.11208 ↗First posted 21 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.CR cs.DScited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most works in learning with differential privacy (DP) have focused on the setting where each user has a single sample. In this work, we consider the setting where each user holds m samples and the privacy protection is enforced at the level of each user's data. We show that, in this setting, we may learn with a much fewer number of users. Specifically, we show that, as long as each user receives sufficiently many samples, we can learn any privately learnable class via an (ε, δ)-DP algorithm using only O(log(1/δ)/ε) users. For ε-DP algorithms, we show that we can learn using only Oε(d) users even in the local model, where d is the probabilistic representation dimension. In both cases, we show a nearly-matching lower bound on the number of users required. A crucial component of our results is a generalization of global stability [Bun et al., FOCS 2020] that allows the use of public randomness. Under this relaxed notion, we employ a correlated sampling strategy to show that the global stability can be boosted to be arbitrarily close to one, at a polynomial expense in the number of samples.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2021.

Builds on

26 of 65 references.

References · 26

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  3. 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 262
  4. 2018Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learningcited by 242
  5. 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 163
  6. 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 147
  7. 2018Distributed Differential Privacy via Shufflingcited by 115
  8. 2019Generative Models for Effective ML on Private, Decentralized Datasetscited by 85
  9. 2018Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimensioncited by 73
  10. 2021Learning with User-Level Privacycited by 72
  11. 2020An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online Predictioncited by 63
  12. 2017Prochlo: Strong Privacy for Analytics in the Crowdcited by 51
14 more
  1. 2020Learning discrete distributions: user vs item-level privacycited by 41
  2. 2020Encode, Shuffle, Analyze Privacy Revisited: Formalizations and Empirical Evaluationcited by 39
  3. 2015Simultaneous Private Learning of Multiple Conceptscited by 34
  4. 2020Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle Modelcited by 34
  5. 2020Sample-efficient proper PAC learning with approximate differential privacycited by 29
  6. 2017Practical Locally Private Heavy Hitterscited by 28
  7. 2019Differentially Private SQL with Bounded User Contributioncited by 27
  8. 2021Differentially Private Aggregation in the Shuffle Model: Almost Central Accuracy in Almost a Single Messagecited by 18
  9. 2019Separating Local & Shuffled Differential Privacy via Histogramscited by 16
  10. 2021Private Counting from Anonymous Messages: Near-Optimal Accuracy with Vanishing Communication Overheadcited by 16
  11. 2019Private Aggregation from Fewer Anonymous Messagescited by 15
  12. 2020Pure Differentially Private Summation from Anonymous Messagescited by 15
  13. 2018Locally Private Learning without Interaction Requires Separationcited by 7
  14. 2021Differentially Private Histograms in the Shuffle Model from Fake Userscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

9 papers.