mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Goldilocks zone: Towards better understanding of neural network loss landscapes

arXiv 1807.02581 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2018cs.LG cs.NE stat.MLcited by 32

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We explore the loss landscape of fully-connected and convolutional neural networks using random, low-dimensional hyperplanes and hyperspheres. Evaluating the Hessian, H, of the loss function on these hypersurfaces, we observe 1) an unusual excess of the number of positive eigenvalues of H, and 2) a large value of Tr(H) / ||H|| at a well defined range of configuration space radii, corresponding to a thick, hollow, spherical shell we refer to as the textitGoldilocks zone. We observe this effect for fully-connected neural networks over a range of network widths and depths on MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets with the ReLU and tanh non-linearities, and a similar effect for convolutional networks. Using our observations, we demonstrate a close connection between the Goldilocks zone, measures of local convexity/prevalence of positive curvature, and the suitability of a network initialization. We show that the high and stable accuracy reached when optimizing on random, low-dimensional hypersurfaces is directly related to the overlap between the hypersurface and the Goldilocks zone, and as a corollary demonstrate that the notion of intrinsic dimension is initialization-dependent. We note that common initialization techniques initialize neural networks in this particular region of unusually high convexity/prevalence of positive curvature, and offer a geometric intuition for their success. Furthermore, we demonstrate that initializing a neural network at a number of points and selecting for high measures of local convexity such as Tr(H) / ||H||, number of positive eigenvalues of H, or low initial loss, leads to statistically significantly faster training on MNIST. Based on our observations, we hypothesize that the Goldilocks zone contains an unusually high density of suitable initialization configurations.

Key facts. Cited by 32 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 10; 2023: 4; 2024: 8; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

32 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Omnigrok: Grokking Beyond Algorithmic Datacited by 146
  2. 2021Priors in Bayesian Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 101
  3. 2023Deep Model Fusion: A Surveycited by 91
  4. 2023Dichotomy of Early and Late Phase Implicit Biases Can Provably Induce Grokkingcited by 80
  5. 2021Analyzing Monotonic Linear Interpolation in Neural Network Loss Landscapescited by 28
  6. 2021How many degrees of freedom do we need to train deep networks: a loss landscape perspectivecited by 28
  7. 2024Information-Theoretic Progress Measures reveal Grokking is an Emergent Phase Transitioncited by 17
  8. 2022On the Power-Law Hessian Spectrums in Deep Learningcited by 16
  9. 2023Latent State Models of Training Dynamicscited by 16
  10. 2024Deep Grokking: Would Deep Neural Networks Generalize Better?cited by 15
  11. 2022On the Overlooked Structure of Stochastic Gradientscited by 13
  12. 2023A Symmetry-Aware Exploration of Bayesian Neural Network Posteriorscited by 12
20 more
  1. 2022Born-Infeld (BI) for AI: Energy-Conserving Descent (ECD) for Optimizationcited by 10
  2. 2025What Can Grokking Teach Us About Learning Under Nonstationarity?cited by 8
  3. 2022What does a deep neural network confidently perceive? The effective dimension of high certainty class manifolds and their low confidence boundariescited by 5
  4. 2024LTAU-FF: Loss Trajectory Analysis for Uncertainty in Atomistic Force Fieldscited by 4
  5. 2024Deconstructing the Goldilocks Zone of Neural Network Initializationcited by 4
  6. 2025High-entropy Advantage in Neural Networks' Generalizabilitycited by 4
  7. 2022A survey of deep learning optimizers -- first and second order methodscited by 3
  8. 2024Acceleration of Grokking in Learning Arithmetic Operations via Kolmogorov-Arnold Representationcited by 3
  9. 2022FuNNscope: Visual microscope for interactively exploring the loss landscape of fully connected neural networkscited by 2
  10. 2024Visualizing, Rethinking, and Mining the Loss Landscape of Deep Neural Networkscited by 1
  11. 2025What Scales in Cross-Entropy Scaling Law?cited by 1
  12. 2026Visualizing the loss landscapes of physics-informed neural networkscited by 1
  13. 2026Landscaper: Understanding Loss Landscapes Through Multi-Dimensional Topological Analysiscited by 1
  14. 2026Lost in the Non-convex Loss Landscape: How to Fine-tune the Large Time Series Model?cited by 1
  15. 2022Complexity from Adaptive-Symmetries Breaking: Global Minima in the Statistical Mechanics of Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
  16. 2022A Local Convergence Theory for the Stochastic Gradient Descent Method in Non-Convex Optimization With Non-isolated Local Minimacited by 0
  17. 2022Hyper-Learning for Gradient-Based Batch Size Adaptationcited by 0
  18. 2024Twin: Tuning Learning Rate and Weight Decay of Deep Homogeneous Classifiers without Validationcited by 0
  19. 2024MEANT: Multimodal Encoder for Antecedent Informationcited by 0
  20. 2025Beginning with You: Perceptual-Initialization Improves Vision-Language Representation and Alignmentcited by 0