LTAU-FF: Loss Trajectory Analysis for Uncertainty in Atomistic Force Fields
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model ensembles are effective tools for estimating prediction uncertainty in deep learning atomistic force fields. However, their widespread adoption is hindered by high computational costs and overconfident error estimates. In this work, we address these challenges by leveraging distributions of per-sample errors obtained during training and employing a distance-based similarity search in the model latent space. Our method, which we call LTAU, efficiently estimates the full probability distribution function (PDF) of errors for any test point using the logged training errors, achieving speeds that are 2--3 orders of magnitudes faster than typical ensemble methods and allowing it to be used for tasks where training or evaluating multiple models would be infeasible. We apply LTAU towards estimating parametric uncertainty in atomistic force fields (LTAU-FF), demonstrating that its improved ensemble diversity produces well-calibrated confidence intervals and predicts errors that correlate strongly with the true errors for data near the training domain. Furthermore, we show that the errors predicted by LTAU-FF can be used in practical applications for detecting out-of-domain data, tuning model performance, and predicting failure during simulations. We believe that LTAU will be a valuable tool for uncertainty quantification (UQ) in atomistic force fields and is a promising method that should be further explored in other domains of machine learning.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2024.
Builds on
46 of 80 references.
References · 46
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
- 2016Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphscited by 853
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
- 2021E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentialscited by 701
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
- 2022MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fieldscited by 467
34 more
- 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 452
- 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 438
- 2021Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectracited by 438
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 417
- 2016Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleyscited by 357
- 2021Exploring the Limits of Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 283
- 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 269
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
- 2022Learning Local Equivariant Representations for Large-Scale Atomistic Dynamicscited by 254
- 2020The Open Catalyst 2020 (OC20) Dataset and Community Challengescited by 246
- 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 224
- 2020Contrastive Training for Improved Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 186
- 2020Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 185
- 2022Graph neural networks for materials science and chemistrycited by 181
- 2022The Design Space of E(3)-Equivariant Atom-Centered Interatomic Potentialscited by 100
- 2020Estimating Example Difficulty Using Variance of Gradientscited by 96
- 2020Uncertainty Quantification Using Neural Networks for Molecular Property Predictioncited by 66
- 2023Simfluence: Modeling the Influence of Individual Training Examples by Simulating Training Runscited by 52
- 2021A Loss Curvature Perspective on Training Instability in Deep Learningcited by 39
- 2023Scaling the leading accuracy of deep equivariant models to biomolecular simulations of realistic sizecited by 33
- 2018The Goldilocks zone: Towards better understanding of neural network loss landscapescited by 32
- 2021AutoDEUQ: Automated Deep Ensemble with Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 31
- 2017Machine Learning Molecular Dynamics for the Simulation of Infrared Spectracited by 30
- 2023Single-model uncertainty quantification in neural network potentials does not consistently outperform model ensemblescited by 30
- 2017Checkpoint Ensembles: Ensemble Methods from a Single Training Processcited by 24
- 2021A Survey on Epistemic (Model) Uncertainty in Supervised Learning: Recent Advances and Applicationscited by 24
- 2019Fast, accurate, and transferable many-body interatomic potentials by symbolic regressioncited by 23
- 2022Fast Uncertainty Estimates in Deep Learning Interatomic Potentialscited by 22
- 2021Calibrated Uncertainty for Molecular Property Prediction using Ensembles of Message Passing Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2022Selective Prediction via Training Dynamicscited by 20
- 2023Uncertainty Estimation for Molecules: Desiderata and Methodscited by 11
- 2023Data efficiency and extrapolation trends in neural network interatomic potentialscited by 10
- 2023TRIAGE: Characterizing and auditing training data for improved regressioncited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026A Systematic Survey and Benchmark of Deep Learning for Molecular Property Prediction in the Foundation Model Eracited by 1
- 2026Knowing when to trust machine-learned interatomic potentialscited by 1
- 2026AdaptNTK: Adaptive Uncertainty Quantification and Active Learning for Neural Network Potentialscited by 0
- 2026AdaptNTK: Adaptive Uncertainty Quantification and Active Learning for Neural Network Potentials31 Aug 2026
- 2026Knowing when to trust machine-learned interatomic potentials1 May 2026
- 2026A Systematic Survey and Benchmark of Deep Learning for Molecular Property Prediction in the Foundation Model Era17 Apr 2026