mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Landscaper: Understanding Loss Landscapes Through Multi-Dimensional Topological Analysis

arXiv 2602.07135 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Loss landscapes are a powerful tool for understanding neural network optimization and generalization, yet traditional low-dimensional analyses often miss complex topological features. We present Landscaper, an open-source Python package for arbitrary-dimensional loss landscape analysis. Landscaper combines Hessian-based subspace construction with topological data analysis to reveal geometric structures such as basin hierarchy and connectivity. A key component is the Saddle-Minimum Average Distance (SMAD) for quantifying landscape smoothness. We demonstrate Landscaper's effectiveness across various architectures and tasks, including those involving pre-trained language models, showing that SMAD captures training transitions, such as landscape simplification, that conventional metrics miss. We also illustrate Landscaper's performance in challenging chemical property prediction tasks, where SMAD can serve as a metric for out-of-distribution generalization, offering valuable insights for model diagnostics and architecture design in data-scarce scientific machine learning scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2026.

Builds on

30 of 41 references.

References · 30

  1. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
  2. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  3. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  4. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  5. 2017SchNet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactionscited by 569
  6. 2020Directional Message Passing for Molecular Graphscited by 556
  7. 2021SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 431
  8. 2021ASAM: Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Scale-Invariant Learning of Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
  9. 2019PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessiancited by 291
  10. 2018Implicit Self-Regularization in Deep Neural Networks: Evidence from Random Matrix Theory and Implications for Learningcited by 211
  11. 2018Gradient Descent Happens in a Tiny Subspacecited by 208
  12. 2020ADAHESSIAN: An Adaptive Second Order Optimizer for Machine Learningcited by 201
18 more
  1. 2014Qualitatively characterizing neural network optimization problemscited by 186
  2. 2020Predicting trends in the quality of state-of-the-art neural networks without access to training or testing datacited by 113
  3. 2019Traditional and Heavy-Tailed Self Regularization in Neural Network Modelscited by 104
  4. 2020On Robustness and Transferability of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 98
  5. 2020Traces of Class/Cross-Class Structure Pervade Deep Learning Spectracited by 94
  6. 2023A Modern Look at the Relationship between Sharpness and Generalizationcited by 91
  7. 2021The MultiBERTs: BERT Reproductions for Robustness Analysiscited by 89
  8. 2019Heavy-Tailed Universality Predicts Trends in Test Accuracies for Very Large Pre-Trained Deep Neural Networkscited by 43
  9. 2021Taxonomizing local versus global structure in neural network loss landscapescited by 34
  10. 2018The Goldilocks zone: Towards better understanding of neural network loss landscapescited by 32
  11. 2020Wide-minima Density Hypothesis and the Explore-Exploit Learning Rate Schedulecited by 25
  12. 2016An empirical analysis of the optimization of deep network loss surfacescited by 21
  13. 2022Evaluating natural language processing models with generalization metrics that do not need access to any training or testing datacited by 18
  14. 2023A Three-regime Model of Network Pruningcited by 15
  15. 2024Mitigating Memorization In Language Modelscited by 11
  16. 2024Evaluating Loss Landscapes from a Topology Perspectivecited by 3
  17. 2024Visualizing Loss Functions as Topological Landscape Profilescited by 2
  18. 2024LossLens: Diagnostics for Machine Learning through Loss Landscape Visual Analyticscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.