What Scales in Cross-Entropy Scaling Law?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The cross-entropy scaling law has long served as a key tool for guiding the development of large language models. It shows that cross-entropy loss decreases in a predictable power-law rate as the model size increases. However, recent evidence indicates that this law breaks down at very large scales: the loss decreases more slowly than expected, which causes significant trouble for developing large language models. In this paper, we hypothesize that the root cause lies in the fact that cross-entropy itself does not truly scale; instead, only one of its hidden components does. To investigate this, we introduce a novel decomposition of cross-entropy into three parts: Error-Entropy, Self-Alignment, and Confidence. We show both theoretically and empirically that this decomposition precisely captures the training dynamics and optimization objectives. Through extensive experiments on multiple datasets and 32 models spanning five orders of magnitude in size, we find that only error-entropy follows a robust power-law scaling, while the other two terms remain largely invariant. Moreover, error-entropy constitutes the dominant share of cross-entropy in small models but diminishes in proportion as models grow larger. This explains why the cross-entropy scaling law appears accurate at small scales but fails at very large ones. Our findings establish the error-entropy scaling law as a more accurate description of model behavior. We believe it will have wide applications in the training, understanding, and future development of large language models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2025.
Builds on
24 of 35 references.
References · 24
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
- 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
- 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 481
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 353
- 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 265
- 2023Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applicationscited by 206
12 more
- 2023The Quantization Model of Neural Scalingcited by 137
- 2021Scaling Laws for Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
- 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
- 2025Scaling Laws of Synthetic Data for Language Modelscited by 44
- 2018The Goldilocks zone: Towards better understanding of neural network loss landscapescited by 32
- 2025Predictable Scale: Part I, Step Law -- Optimal Hyperparameter Scaling Law in Large Language Model Pretrainingcited by 30
- 2025Scaling Laws Are Unreliable for Downstream Tasks: A Reality Checkcited by 27
- 2024An Empirical Study of Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 9
- 2019Restricted Minimum Error Entropy Criterion for Robust Classificationcited by 8
- 2024Neural Scaling Laws From Large-N Field Theory: Solvable Model Beyond the Ridgeless Limitcited by 5
- 2017Quantized Minimum Error Entropy Criterioncited by 4
- 2024Deconstructing the Goldilocks Zone of Neural Network Initializationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.