mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The LAMA Planner: Guiding Cost-Based Anytime Planning with Landmarks

arXiv 1401.3839 ↗First posted 16 Jan 2014cs.AIcited by 86

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

LAMA is a classical planning system based on heuristic forward search. Its core feature is the use of a pseudo-heuristic derived from landmarks, propositional formulas that must be true in every solution of a planning task. LAMA builds on the Fast Downward planning system, using finite-domain rather than binary state variables and multi-heuristic search. The latter is employed to combine the landmark heuristic with a variant of the well-known FF heuristic. Both heuristics are cost-sensitive, focusing on high-quality solutions in the case where actions have non-uniform cost. A weighted A* search is used with iteratively decreasing weights, so that the planner continues to search for plans of better quality until the search is terminated. LAMA showed best performance among all planners in the sequential satisficing track of the International Planning Competition 2008. In this paper we present the system in detail and investigate which features of LAMA are crucial for its performance. We present individual results for some of the domains used at the competition, demonstrating good and bad cases for the techniques implemented in LAMA. Overall, we find that using landmarks improves performance, whereas the incorporation of action costs into the heuristic estimators proves not to be beneficial. We show that in some domains a search that ignores cost solves far more problems, raising the question of how to deal with action costs more effectively in the future. The iterated weighted A* search greatly improves results, and shows synergy effects with the use of landmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 86 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2014.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 10; 2022: 9; 2023: 16; 2024: 16; 2025: 13; 2026: 22.

86 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Generalized Planning in PDDL Domains with Pretrained Large Language Modelscited by 139
  2. 2021Heuristic-Guided Reinforcement Learningcited by 41
  3. 2023Learning Domain-Independent Heuristics for Grounded and Lifted Planningcited by 31
  4. 2024NL2Plan: Robust LLM-Driven Planning from Minimal Text Descriptionscited by 22
  5. 2021Classical Planning in Deep Latent Spacecited by 21
  6. 2021Policy-Guided Heuristic Search with Guaranteescited by 20
  7. 2024Return to Tradition: Learning Reliable Heuristics with Classical Machine Learningcited by 19
  8. 2021Generalized Planning as Heuristic Searchcited by 18
  9. 2025Classical Planning with LLM-Generated Heuristics: Challenging the State of the Art with Python Codecited by 18
  10. 2022Scaling-up Generalized Planning as Heuristic Search with Landmarkscited by 14
  11. 2022Learning Sketches for Decomposing Planning Problems into Subproblems of Bounded Width: Extended Versioncited by 12
  12. 2022Fast and Precise: Adjusting Planning Horizon with Adaptive Subgoal Searchcited by 12
38 more
  1. 2021Expressing and Exploiting the Common Subgoal Structure of Classical Planning Domains Using Sketches: Extended Versioncited by 9
  2. 2022Goal Recognition as Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
  3. 2022Goal Recognition as a Deep Learning Task: the GRNet Approachcited by 9
  4. 2022Learning Graph Search Heuristicscited by 7
  5. 2021Heuristic Search Planning with Deep Neural Networks using Imitation, Attention and Curriculum Learningcited by 6
  6. 2023NeSIG: A Neuro-Symbolic Method for Learning to Generate Planning Problemscited by 6
  7. 2023Generalized Planning as Heuristic Search: A new planning search-space that leverages pointers over objectscited by 6
  8. 2023General Policies, Subgoal Structure, and Planning Widthcited by 6
  9. 2024Novelty Heuristics, Multi-Queue Search, and Portfolios for Numeric Planningcited by 6
  10. 2025Frontier Large Language Models Rival State-of-the-Art Plannerscited by 6
  11. 2023Novelty and Lifted Helpful Actions in Generalized Planningcited by 5
  12. 2025Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated Planningcited by 5
  13. 2021Approximate Novelty Searchcited by 4
  14. 2023STAMP: Differentiable Task and Motion Planning via Stein Variational Gradient Descentcited by 4
  15. 2024What's the Plan? Evaluating and Developing Planning-Aware Techniques for Language Modelscited by 4
  16. 2025Leveraging Action Relational Structures for Integrated Learning and Planningcited by 4
  17. 2022Sampling from Pre-Images to Learn Heuristic Functions for Classical Planningcited by 3
  18. 2023PushWorld: A benchmark for manipulation planning with tools and movable obstaclescited by 3
  19. 2021E-PDDL: A Standardized Way of Defining Epistemic Planning Problemscited by 2
  20. 2023A Review of Symbolic, Subsymbolic and Hybrid Methods for Sequential Decision Makingcited by 2
  21. 2024Improving Plan Execution Flexibility using Block-Substitutioncited by 2
  22. 2024Deep Learning for Generalised Planning with Background Knowledgecited by 2
  23. 2025Learning Efficiency Meets Symmetry Breakingcited by 2
  24. 2021Comprehensive Multi-Agent Epistemic Planningcited by 1
  25. 2022Fairness in Multi-Agent Planningcited by 1
  26. 2022Planning with Complex Data Types in PDDLcited by 1
  27. 2023Planning as Theorem Proving with Heuristicscited by 1
  28. 2023Multimodal Contextualized Plan Prediction for Embodied Task Completioncited by 1
  29. 2024Relevance Score: A Landmark-Like Heuristic for Planningcited by 1
  30. 2024Automatically Learning HTN Methods from Landmarkscited by 1
  31. 2024Action Model Learning with Guaranteescited by 1
  32. 2024Reducing Human-Robot Goal State Divergence with Environment Designcited by 1
  33. 2024Improving Execution Concurrency in Partial-Order Plans via Block-Substitutioncited by 1
  34. 2024Count-based Novelty Exploration in Classical Planningcited by 1
  35. 2024Learning to Ground Existentially Quantified Goalscited by 1
  36. 2025Landmark-Assisted Monte Carlo Planningcited by 1
  37. 2026Reinforcing the World's Edge: A Continual Learning Problem in the Multi-Agent-World Boundarycited by 1
  38. 2026Analysis of Optimality of Large Language Models on Planning Problemscited by 1

50 most cited of 86 All 86 (JSON)