mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Expressing and Exploiting the Common Subgoal Structure of Classical Planning Domains Using Sketches: Extended Version

arXiv 2105.04250 ↗First posted 10 May 2021cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Width-based planning methods deal with conjunctive goals by decomposing problems into subproblems of low width. Algorithms like SIW thus fail when the goal is not easily serializable in this way or when some of the subproblems have a high width. In this work, we address these limitations by using a simple but powerful language for expressing finer problem decompositions introduced recently by Bonet and Geffner, called policy sketches. A policy sketch over a set of Boolean and numerical features is a set of sketch rules that express how the values of these features are supposed to change. Like general policies, policy sketches are domain general, but unlike policies, the changes captured by sketch rules do not need to be achieved in a single step. We show that many planning domains that cannot be solved by SIW are provably solvable in low polynomial time with the SIW_R algorithm, the version of SIW that employs user-provided policy sketches. Policy sketches are thus shown to be a powerful language for expressing domain-specific knowledge in a simple and compact way and a convenient alternative to languages such as HTNs or temporal logics. Furthermore, they make it easy to express general problem decompositions and prove key properties of them like their width and complexity.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2021.

Builds on

10 of 38 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  2. 2014The LAMA Planner: Guiding Cost-Based Anytime Planning with Landmarkscited by 86
  3. 2019Learning First-Order Symbolic Representations for Planning from the Structure of the State Spacecited by 38
  4. 2019What Can Learned Intrinsic Rewards Capture?cited by 36
  5. 2018Learning Features and Abstract Actions for Computing Generalized Planscited by 35
  6. 2018Features, Projections, and Representation Change for Generalized Planningcited by 25
  7. 2019Unsupervised Grounding of Plannable First-Order Logic Representation from Imagescited by 24
  8. 2019Qualitative Numeric Planning: Reductions and Complexitycited by 18
  9. 2021Learning General Policies from Small Examples Without Supervisioncited by 7
  10. 2019HDDL -- A Language to Describe Hierarchical Planning Problemscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

9 papers.