mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dynamic Tree Databases in Automated Planning

arXiv 2511.12677 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2025cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A central challenge in scaling up explicit state-space search for large tasks is compactly representing the set of generated states. Tree databases, a data structure from model checking, require constant space per generated state in the best case, but they need a large preallocation of memory. We propose a novel dynamic variant of tree databases for compressing state sets over propositional and numeric variables and prove that it maintains the desirable properties of the static counterpart. Our empirical evaluation of state compression techniques for grounded and lifted planning on classical and numeric planning tasks reveals compression ratios of several orders of magnitude, often with negligible runtime overhead.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2025.

Builds on

4 of 33 references.

References · 4

  1. 2014The LAMA Planner: Guiding Cost-Based Anytime Planning with Landmarkscited by 86
  2. 2023MinePlanner: A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Planning in Large Minecraft Worldscited by 5
  3. 2024Optimal Layout-Aware CNOT Circuit Synthesis with Qubit Permutationcited by 4
  4. 2019Dynamic Path-Decomposed Triescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.