mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving Plan Execution Flexibility using Block-Substitution

arXiv 2406.03091 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2024cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Partial-order plans in AI planning facilitate execution flexibility due to their less-constrained nature. Maximizing plan flexibility has been studied through the notions of plan deordering, and plan reordering. Plan deordering removes unnecessary action orderings within a plan, while plan reordering modifies them arbitrarily to minimize action orderings. This study, in contrast with traditional plan deordering and reordering strategies, improves a plan's flexibility by substituting its subplans with actions outside the plan for a planning problem. Our methodology builds on block deordering, which eliminates orderings in a POP by encapsulating coherent actions in blocks, yielding a hierarchically structured plan termed a Block Decomposed Partial-Order (BDPO) plan. We consider the action blocks in a BDPO plan as candidate subplans for substitutions, and ensure that each successful substitution produces a plan with strictly greater flexibility. In addition, this paper employs plan reduction strategies to eliminate redundant actions within a BDPO plan. We also evaluate our approach when combined with MaxSAT-based reorderings. Our experimental result demonstrates a significant improvement in plan execution flexibility on the benchmark problems from International Planning Competitions (IPC), maintaining good coverage and execution time.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2024.

Builds on

2 of 48 references.

References · 2

  1. 2014The LAMA Planner: Guiding Cost-Based Anytime Planning with Landmarkscited by 87
  2. 2020FAPE: a Constraint-based Planner for Generative and Hierarchical Temporal Planningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.