mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Efficient Test-time Inference for Generative Planning Models with OCL Search

arXiv 2606.00618 ↗First posted 30 May 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative models have emerged as a powerful paradigm for AI planning, yet their performance remains constrained by the training data distribution. One approach is to improve generated solutions during inference by scaling test-time compute. A more efficient alternative is to optimize the inference process itself. In this paper, we show that a modified version of a classical Open-Closed List (OCL) search provides just such an efficient inference procedure. Our algorithm synergizes two learned components: a generative model that performs fast rollouts from intermediate states and a heuristic model that prioritizes among candidate reasoning paths. Key contributions include novel exploration control mechanisms and integration of learned models within the OCL framework. Across multiple combinatorial planning domains, our approach outperforms both neurosymbolic search baselines and classical solvers in computational efficiency and solution quality.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.

Builds on

15 of 41 references.

References · 15

  1. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
  2. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  3. 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 734
  4. 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Searchcited by 344
  5. 2025rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinkingcited by 313
  6. 2017Thinking Fast and Slow with Deep Learning and Tree Searchcited by 252
  7. 2024DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Searchcited by 197
  8. 2023Planning with Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 182
  9. 2024AlphaMath Almost Zero: Process Supervision without Processcited by 162
  10. 2024SWE-Search: Enhancing Software Agents with Monte Carlo Tree Search and Iterative Refinementcited by 132
  11. 2024Beyond A*: Better Planning with Transformers via Search Dynamics Bootstrappingcited by 90
  12. 2014The LAMA Planner: Guiding Cost-Based Anytime Planning with Landmarkscited by 87
3 more
  1. 2017Learning Generalized Reactive Policies using Deep Neural Networkscited by 39
  2. 2025Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated Planningcited by 5
  3. 2026Self-Improvement for Fast, High-Quality Plan Generationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025PlanGEN: A Multi-Agent Framework for Generating Planning and Reasoning Trajectories for Complex Problem Solving
  2. 2024Query-Efficient Planning with Language Models
  3. 2024On The Planning Abilities of OpenAI's o1 Models: Feasibility, Optimality, and Generalizability
  4. 2021Planning from Pixels in Environments with Combinatorially Hard Search Spaces
  5. 2025A Multi-Agent Framework for Stateful Inference-Time Search
  6. 2026GRASP: Generating, Revising, and Assessing for Strategic Planning with Agentic AI
  7. 2025Learning When to Plan: Efficiently Allocating Test-Time Compute for LLM Agents
  8. 2026PathWise: Planning through World Model for Automated Heuristic Design via Self-Evolving LLMs