mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RM-OPD: On-Policy Distillation for Generative Reward Models

arXiv 2610.20174 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF also fits: Reward hacking and misspecification

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning on Mixed-domain preference data (Mix-RL) has become the mainstream approach for training general-purpose Generative Reward Models (GRMs). However, Mix-RL suffers from two critical bottlenecks: the reward sparsity induced by outcome rewards, and the cross-domain interference arising from jointly optimizing heterogeneous capabilities, which together give rise to imbalanced capability acquisition and pervasive reward hacking. Inspired by the success of On-Policy Distillation (OPD) in multi-domain capability integration, we introduce RM-OPD (Reward Modeling via On-Policy Distillation), a two-stage framework that separates specialist acquisition from capability integration. First, we cultivate domain-specialized teacher models via single-domain GRPO fine-tuning, allowing each expert to reach its performance ceiling in isolation; then we consolidate these teachers into one student model through (i) routed on-policy distillation, which provides dense signed token-level supervision on student-generated critiques; (ii) domain contribution reweighting, which reweights token guidance toward target domain shares, preventing specific domains from dominating optimization; and (iii) optional criteria context distillation, which conditions teachers on domain-specific evaluation criteria to sharpen token-level supervision. Across multiple RM benchmarks and two base models, RM-OPD consistently outperforms vanilla Mix-RL and other strong baselines, achieving overall superior performance and exhibiting an emergent "teacher-surpassing" effect. These results establish RM-OPD as a promising paradigm for building generalist GRMs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 40 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.

Builds on

40 of 43 references.

Closest ancestors · 12

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Outcome Accuracy is Not Enough: Aligning the Reasoning Process of Reward Models4 Feb
  2. 2026Reward Modeling from Natural Language Human Feedback12 Jan
  3. 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergy2 Jul
  4. 2025RewardAnything: Generalizable Principle-Following Reward Models4 Jun
  5. 2025RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluation2 Jun
  6. 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modeling3 Apr
  7. 2024Self-Generated Critiques Boost Reward Modeling for Language Models25 Nov
  8. 2024RM-Bench: Benchmarking Reward Models of Language Models with Subtlety and Style21 Oct
  9. 2024RMB: Comprehensively Benchmarking Reward Models in LLM Alignment13 Oct
  10. 2024Beyond Scalar Reward Model: Learning Generative Judge from Preference Data1 Oct
  11. 2024Critique-out-Loud Reward Models21 Aug
  12. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling20 Mar

Other references · 28

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  4. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  5. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  6. 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 1,040
  7. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 939
  8. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 801
  9. 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 587
  10. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 480
  11. 2026Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 455
  12. 2015Policy Distillationcited by 440
16 more
  1. 2019Which Tasks Should Be Learned Together in Multi-task Learning?cited by 375
  2. 2026Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillationcited by 332
  3. 2024JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judgescited by 318
  4. 2026Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipecited by 299
  5. 2024PKU-SafeRLHF: Towards Multi-Level Safety Alignment for LLMs with Human Preferencecited by 261
  6. 2026MiMo-V2-Flash Technical Reportcited by 191
  7. 2026On-Policy Context Distillation for Language Modelscited by 186
  8. 2026Learning beyond Teacher: Generalized On-Policy Distillation with Reward Extrapolationcited by 184
  9. 2025RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoningcited by 154
  10. 2026Self-Distilled RLVRcited by 131
  11. 2025JudgeLRM: Large Reasoning Models as a Judgecited by 78
  12. 2025Improve LLM-as-a-Judge Ability as a General Abilitycited by 37
  13. 2026Open-MOPD: Diagnosing and Fixing Capability Imbalance in Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillationcited by 18
  14. 2025CompassJudger-2: Towards Generalist Judge Model via Verifiable Rewardscited by 12
  15. 2026Self-Evaluation Is Already There: Eliciting Latent Judge Calibration in Base LLMs with Minimal Datacited by 2
  16. 2026Themis: Training Robust Multilingual Code Reward Models for Flexible Multi-Criteria Scoringcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Reward-Aligned Distillation
  2. 2026On-policy Distillation with Verifiable Reward
  3. 2026REOPD: Reliability-Adaptive Reward Extrapolation for On-Policy Distillation
  4. 2026On the Position Bias of On-Policy Distillation
  5. 2026RM-Distiller: Exploiting Generative LLM for Reward Model Distillation
  6. 2026Uni-OPD: Unifying On-Policy Distillation with a Dual-Perspective Recipe
  7. 2026Gains and Collapse in On-Policy Distillation:A Reinforcement Learning Perspective
  8. 2026CARE-RL: Capability-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Mitigating Cross-Domain Conflicts