mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RM-Distiller: Exploiting Generative LLM for Reward Model Distillation

arXiv 2601.14032 ↗First posted 20 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Reward models (RMs) play a pivotal role in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Due to the difficulty of obtaining high-quality human preference annotations, distilling preferences from generative LLMs has emerged as a standard practice. However, existing approaches predominantly treat teacher models as simple binary annotators, failing to fully exploit the rich knowledge and capabilities for RM distillation. To address this, we propose RM-Distiller, a framework designed to systematically exploit the multifaceted capabilities of teacher LLMs: (1) Refinement capability, which synthesizes highly correlated response pairs to create fine-grained and contrastive signals. (2) Scoring capability, which guides the RM in capturing precise preference strength via a margin-aware optimization objective. (3) Generation capability, which incorporates the teacher's generative distribution to regularize the RM to preserve its fundamental linguistic knowledge. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RM-Distiller significantly outperforms traditional distillation methods both on RM benchmarks and reinforcement learning-based alignment, proving that exploiting multifaceted teacher capabilities is critical for effective reward modeling. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic research on RM distillation from generative LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 38 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2026.

Builds on

38 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 17

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergy2 Jul
  2. 2025GRAM: A Generative Foundation Reward Model for Reward Generalization17 Jun
  3. 2025RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluation2 Jun
  4. 2025Think-J: Learning to Think for Generative LLM-as-a-Judge20 May
  5. 2025A Comprehensive Survey of Reward Models: Taxonomy, Applications, Challenges, and Future12 Apr
  6. 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modeling3 Apr
  7. 2025Agentic Reward Modeling: Integrating Human Preferences with Verifiable Correctness Signals for Reliable Reward Systems26 Feb
  8. 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMs24 Oct
  9. 2024RM-Bench: Benchmarking Reward Models of Language Models with Subtlety and Style21 Oct
  10. 2024HelpSteer2-Preference: Complementing Ratings with Preferences2 Oct
  11. 2024Uncertainty-aware Reward Model: Teaching Reward Models to Know What is Unknown1 Oct
  12. 2024Critique-out-Loud Reward Models21 Aug
5 more
  1. 2024Regularizing Hidden States Enables Learning Generalizable Reward Model for LLMs14 Jun
  2. 2024Improving Reward Models with Synthetic Critiques31 May
  3. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling20 Mar
  4. 2023SteerLM: Attribute Conditioned SFT as an (User-Steerable) Alternative to RLHF9 Oct
  5. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr

Other references · 21

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  6. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  7. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  8. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  9. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  10. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  11. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,810
  12. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
9 more
  1. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
  2. 2024Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Treescited by 192
  3. 2023FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 117
  4. 2024An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge for LLM Evaluation: Fine-tuned Judge Model is not a General Substitute for GPT-4cited by 94
  5. 2024OffsetBias: Leveraging Debiased Data for Tuning Evaluatorscited by 94
  6. 2025JudgeLRM: Large Reasoning Models as a Judgecited by 78
  7. 2024CFBench: A Comprehensive Constraints-Following Benchmark for LLMscited by 67
  8. 2024Mitigating the Bias of Large Language Model Evaluationcited by 17
  9. 2024Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Two Minds Better Than One: Collaborative Reward Modeling for LLM Alignment
  2. 2025Capturing Nuanced Preferences: Preference-Aligned Distillation for Small Language Models
  3. 2025LongRM: Revealing and Unlocking the Context Boundary of Reward Modeling
  4. 2024RMB: Comprehensively Benchmarking Reward Models in LLM Alignment
  5. 2025Sentence-level Reward Model can Generalize Better for Aligning LLM from Human Preference
  6. 2025Aligning LLMs with Domain Invariant Reward Models
  7. 2026RMGAP: Benchmarking the Generalization of Reward Models across Diverse Preferences
  8. 2025PIRA: Preference-Oriented Instruction-Tuned Reward Models with Dual Aggregation