mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neuro-Symbolic Graph Transformers for Hierarchical Intention Recognition from Multimodal Human Activity Sequences

arXiv 2610.18176 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2026cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Proactive human-robot collaboration requires autonomous systems to infer not only immediate actions but also the underlying hierarchical intentions governing human behavior. Current deep learning approaches predominantly focus on flat action classification, failing to capture the structural dependencies connecting kinematic motion to high-level goals. A Neuro-Symbolic Graph Transformer (NSGT) is proposed within this multimodal framework, a Human Reasoning Graph (HR-G) is integrated into the self-attention mechanism via learnable topological biases. Furthermore, the architecture is augmented with a differentiable First-Order Logic (FOL) loss, acting as a structural regularizer by which ontological consistency is enforced across four levels: atomic actions, composite activities, Low-Level Intentions, and High-Level Intentions. Evaluation is performed on the synthesized NTU-Hierarchy dataset, a four-level ontological extension of NTU RGB+D 120, wherein existing sequences were mapped into 119,383 complex hierarchical episodes (85 actions, 16 activities, 8 LLIs, 4 HLIs). To prevent circular supervision, strict isolation between label generation and FOL constraints was maintained. In the base configuration, 91.65% top-1 action accuracy is achieved by the NSGT. When the FOL loss is incorporated into the baseline, logic consistency is improved by 3.26 percentage points to 96.67%. Through the HR-G biases, a tunable trade-off between accuracy and structural coherence is established. In the primary consistency-maximizing configuration (λ = 0.5), a logic consistency of 94.59% is reached and ontological contradictions are reduced by 33%, while a robust 89.90% top-1 action accuracy is retained. Finally, interpretable reasoning evidence is provided by the learned HR-G weights, wherein transition edges are strongly exploited (β trans ≈ +2.6) without explicit supervision.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.

Builds on

26 of 45 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  3. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,694
  4. 2018Spatial Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognitioncited by 1,209
  5. 2014Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 1,068
  6. 2017Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 1,013
  7. 2016Hollywood in Homes: Crowdsourcing Data Collection for Activity Understandingcited by 537
  8. 2019NTU RGB+D 120: A Large-Scale Benchmark for 3D Human Activity Understandingcited by 533
  9. 2023VideoMAE V2: Scaling Video Masked Autoencoders with Dual Maskingcited by 528
  10. 2019CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoningcited by 484
  11. 2019Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming in DeepProbLogcited by 394
  12. 2019MS-TCN: Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Network for Action Segmentationcited by 373
14 more
  1. 2021Channel-wise Topology Refinement Graph Convolution for Skeleton-Based Action Recognitioncited by 322
  2. 2017A Semantic Loss Function for Deep Learning with Symbolic Knowledgecited by 270
  3. 2021Revisiting Skeleton-based Action Recognitioncited by 257
  4. 2020Logic Tensor Networkscited by 199
  5. 2020A Short Note on the Kinetics-700-2020 Human Action Datasetcited by 92
  6. 2020Spatial Temporal Transformer Network for Skeleton-based Action Recognitioncited by 77
  7. 2024SkateFormer: Skeletal-Temporal Transformer for Human Action Recognitioncited by 47
  8. 2016Joint Attention in Autonomous Driving (JAAD)cited by 36
  9. 2025Deep Learning Approaches for Multimodal Intent Recognition: A Surveycited by 6
  10. 2016Logic Tensor Networks: Deep Learning and Logical Reasoning from Data and Knowledgecited by 5
  11. 2025Body-Hand Modality Expertized Networks with Cross-attention for Fine-grained Skeleton Action Recognitioncited by 4
  12. 2025Social Human Robot Embodied Conversation (SHREC) Dataset: Benchmarking Foundational Models' Social Reasoningcited by 2
  13. 2025Multi-task Learning For Joint Action and Gesture Recognitioncited by 1
  14. 2026Compositional Benchmark Synthesis for Hierarchical Human Action Recognitioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.