Sparse-TD-JEPA: Improving Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning With Sparse Latent Task Representations
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Deep RL algorithms and representations
Abstract (arXiv)
Successor-feature-based zero-shot reinforcement learning methods pre-train a task encoder and successor-feature predictor on offline, reward-free data, then recover a policy at test time by solving a closed-form linear regression over a small labeled dataset. We identify an underexplored limitation of this approach: when the task encoder produces dense representations, the inferred reward signal becomes diffuse across the state space, reducing the contrast between goal-relevant states and the background and providing a weaker signal for the policy to follow. We address this limitation by introducing an l1 sparsity penalty that concentrates reward-predictive structure into a smaller effective subspace of the task encoder's latent space. The penalty is applied only during training and requires no architectural change or modification to the closed-form inference procedure. We instantiate this approach as Sparse-TD-JEPA, a single-line of code addition based on Temporal-Difference Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (TD-JEPA) that significantly improved its performance in zero-shot reinforcement learning. We evaluate Sparse-TD-JEPA on 65 tasks across the DeepMind Control (DMC) Suite and OGBench, covering locomotion, navigation, trajectory stitching, puzzle solving, and robotic manipulation. Sparse-TD-JEPA improves over TD-JEPA in all 13 domain-level comparisons. On DMC, it increases the average return from 661 +- 6 to 714 +- 3. On OGBench, it increases the average success rate from 38.0 +- 0.8 to 48.4 +- 2.3, with improvements of 13.4-18.0 percentage points on the evaluated antmaze navigation and stitching domains. Overall, Sparse-TD-JEPA achieves the highest mean performance among established zero-shot baselines in nine of the 13 domains. Analysis further shows that sparsity produces a sharper and more task-informative inferred reward landscape.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.
Builds on
21 of 31 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025TD-JEPA: Latent-predictive Representations for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning1 Oct
- 2024Foundation Policies with Hilbert Representations23 Feb
Other references · 19
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 1,039
- 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 956
- 2025V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planningcited by 809
- 2024Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Videocited by 531
- 2021Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networkscited by 527
- 2020dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 375
- 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 340
- 2024OGBench: Benchmarking Offline Goal-Conditioned RLcited by 238
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 215
- 2017L2 Regularization versus Batch and Weight Normalizationcited by 124
- 2021Learning One Representation to Optimize All Rewardscited by 115
7 more
- 2022Don't Change the Algorithm, Change the Data: Exploratory Data for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
- 2013Dropout Training as Adaptive Regularizationcited by 93
- 2018The Laplacian in RL: Learning Representations with Efficient Approximationscited by 86
- 2023Reinforcement Learning from Passive Data via Latent Intentionscited by 68
- 2018The Utility of Sparse Representations for Control in Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
- 2025Self-Predictive Representations for Combinatorial Generalization in Behavioral Cloningcited by 12
- 2026Regularized Latent Dynamics Prediction is a Strong Baseline For Behavioral Foundation Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Tackling the Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning Loss Directly
- 2024Unsupervised Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning via Functional Reward Encodings
- 2024Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning via Function Encoders
- 2023Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning from Low Quality Data
- 2026MSPR: Multi-scale Predictive Representations for Goal-conditioned Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Improving Zero-Shot Offline RL via Behavioral Task Sampling
- 2026Soft Forward-Backward Representations for Zero-shot Reinforcement Learning with General Utilities
- 2026Reward-Zero: Language Embedding Driven Implicit Reward Mechanisms for Reinforcement Learning