Tackling the Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning Loss Directly
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Zero-shot reinforcement learning (RL) methods aim at instantly producing a behavior for an RL task in a given environment, from a description of the reward function. These methods are usually tested by evaluating their average performance on a series of downstream tasks. Yet they cannot be trained directly for that objective, unless the distribution of downstream tasks is known. Existing approaches either use other learning criteria [BBQ+ 18, TRO23, TO21, HDB+ 19], or explicitly set a prior on downstream tasks, such as reward functions given by a random neural network [FPAL24]. Here we prove that the zero-shot RL loss can be optimized directly, for a range of non-informative priors such as white noise rewards, temporally smooth rewards, ``scattered'' sparse rewards, or a combination of those. Thus, it is possible to learn the optimal zero-shot features algorithmically, for a wide mixture of priors. Surprisingly, the white noise prior leads to an objective almost identical to the one in VISR [HDB+19], via a different approach. This shows that some seemingly arbitrary choices in VISR, such as Von Mises--Fisher distributions, do maximize downstream performance. This also suggests more efficient ways to tackle the VISR objective. Finally, we discuss some consequences and limitations of the zero-shot RL objective, such as its tendency to produce narrow optimal features if only using Gaussian dense reward priors.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2025.
Builds on
12 of 14 references.
References · 12
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 734
- 2019Fast Task Inference with Variational Intrinsic Successor Featurescited by 131
- 2021Learning One Representation to Optimize All Rewardscited by 110
- 2018Universal Successor Features Approximatorscited by 102
- 2023A Tutorial on Meta-Reinforcement Learningcited by 102
- 2022Does Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning Exist?cited by 79
- 2021Learning Successor States and Goal-Dependent Values: A Mathematical Viewpointcited by 67
- 2021The Information Geometry of Unsupervised Reinforcement Learningcited by 36
- 2024Unsupervised Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning via Functional Reward Encodingscited by 31
- 2024Finer Behavioral Foundation Models via Auto-Regressive Features and Advantage Weightingcited by 12
- 2021Unbiased Methods for Multi-Goal Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.