mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Utility of Sparse Representations for Control in Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 1811.06626 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2018cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate sparse representations for control in reinforcement learning. While these representations are widely used in computer vision, their prevalence in reinforcement learning is limited to sparse coding where extracting representations for new data can be computationally intensive. Here, we begin by demonstrating that learning a control policy incrementally with a representation from a standard neural network fails in classic control domains, whereas learning with a representation obtained from a neural network that has sparsity properties enforced is effective. We provide evidence that the reason for this is that the sparse representation provides locality, and so avoids catastrophic interference, and particularly keeps consistent, stable values for bootstrapping. We then discuss how to learn such sparse representations. We explore the idea of Distributional Regularizers, where the activation of hidden nodes is encouraged to match a particular distribution that results in sparse activation across time. We identify a simple but effective way to obtain sparse representations, not afforded by previously proposed strategies, making it more practical for further investigation into sparse representations for reinforcement learning.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Addressing Loss of Plasticity and Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Learningcited by 50
  2. 2024Streaming Deep Reinforcement Learning Finally Workscited by 25
  3. 2022Investigating the Properties of Neural Network Representations in Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
  4. 2021Catastrophic Interference in Reinforcement Learning: A Solution Based on Context Division and Knowledge Distillationcited by 15
  5. 2021Correcting Momentum in Temporal Difference Learningcited by 12
  6. 2021SPeCiaL: Self-Supervised Pretraining for Continual Learningcited by 12
  7. 2024Locality Sensitive Sparse Encoding for Learning World Models Onlinecited by 12
  8. 2025Simplicial Embeddings Improve Sample Efficiency in Actor-Critic Agentscited by 12
  9. 2023Elephant Neural Networks: Born to Be a Continual Learnercited by 10
  10. 2023Online Reinforcement Learning in Non-Stationary Context-Driven Environmentscited by 6
  11. 2023Utility-based Perturbed Gradient Descent: An Optimizer for Continual Learningcited by 5
  12. 2023Measuring and Mitigating Interference in Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
12 more
  1. 2021Parameter-free Gradient Temporal Difference Learningcited by 1
  2. 2021The Impact of Data Distribution on Q-learning with Function Approximationcited by 1
  3. 2022Tackling Visual Control via Multi-View Exploration Maximizationcited by 1
  4. 2024Hadamard Representation: Scaffolding Performance Across Model-free RLcited by 1
  5. 2026Value Bonuses using Ensemble Errors for Exploration in Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  6. 2021Knowledge Consolidation based Class Incremental Online Learning with Limited Datacited by 0
  7. 2022Online Attentive Kernel-Based Temporal Difference Learningcited by 0
  8. 2022Visual Radial Basis Q-Networkcited by 0
  9. 2024Optimal Control with Natural Images: Efficient Reinforcement Learning using Overcomplete Sparse Codescited by 0
  10. 2025Efficient Reinforcement Learning by Reducing Forgetting with Elephant Activation Functionscited by 0
  11. 2025Learning Distinguishable Representations in Deep Q-Networks for Linear Transfercited by 0
  12. 2026Sparse-TD-JEPA: Improving Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning With Sparse Latent Task Representationscited by 0