mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PortraitAes: Intent-Conditioned Structured Portrait Aesthetic Assessment

arXiv 2610.05010 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Portrait aesthetic assessment assigns comparable scores according to how effectively human-centered images fulfill their photographic intent. These scores support data filtering, candidate selection, and preference modeling in image-generation pipelines. Existing methods typically predict a single aesthetic score or use general-purpose MLLMs without conditioning on photographic intent. This omission matters because the same blur, pose, lighting, or framing choice may serve one photographic intent but undermine another. These models thus learn context-agnostic aesthetic priors and yield inconsistent, inaccurate, misleading judgments for portraits with distinct photographic objectives. We introduce PortraitAes-Bench, an 11K-scale benchmark that decomposes this task into intent-conditioned subjudgments. Expert-authored rubrics define nine photographic intents, six first-level dimensions, and 22 secondary criteria. They support a structured pipeline for intent routing, specialist assessment, verification, and score fusion. Following this structure, we train PortraitAes with multi-task supervision. We then improve score comparability through Gaussian score calibration and within-dimension cross-image ranking. On the standard benchmark, PortraitAes achieves a Pearson correlation of 0.924 and a Spearman rank correlation of 0.934. On the hard-case set, its Pearson correlation is 0.829 and its Spearman rank correlation is 0.795. Across both sets, PortraitAes outperforms the evaluated general-purpose MLLMs and specialized aesthetic baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.

Builds on

28 of 37 references.

References · 28

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  3. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
  4. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
  5. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,345
  6. 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,081
  7. 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,045
  8. 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 977
  9. 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 890
  10. 2023Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levelscited by 503
  11. 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 389
  12. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 355
16 more
  1. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 223
  2. 2016Photo Aesthetics Ranking Network with Attributes and Content Adaptationcited by 125
  3. 2024Learning Multi-dimensional Human Preference for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 106
  4. 2024AesBench: An Expert Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models on Image Aesthetics Perceptioncited by 65
  5. 2022Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment with Rich Attributescited by 58
  6. 2019Effective Aesthetics Prediction with Multi-level Spatially Pooled Featurescited by 53
  7. 2024UNIAA: A Unified Multi-modal Image Aesthetic Assessment Baseline and Benchmarkcited by 42
  8. 2025ArtiMuse: Fine-Grained Image Aesthetics Assessment with Joint Scoring and Expert-Level Understandingcited by 41
  9. 2025UniPercept: Towards Unified Perceptual-Level Image Understanding across Aesthetics, Quality, Structure, and Texturecited by 22
  10. 2026Qwen-Image-Bench: From Generation to Creation in Text-to-Image Evaluationcited by 22
  11. 2025HumanAesExpert: Advancing a Multi-Modality Foundation Model for Human Image Aesthetic Assessmentcited by 19
  12. 2022Understanding Aesthetics with Language: A Photo Critique Dataset for Aesthetic Assessmentcited by 15
  13. 2023An Image Quality Assessment Dataset for Portraitscited by 14
  14. 2015The Beauty of Capturing Faces: Rating the Quality of Digital Portraitscited by 5
  15. 2026Q-Bench-Portrait: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models on Portrait Image Quality Perceptioncited by 2
  16. 2026PortraitCraft: A Benchmark for Portrait Composition Understanding and Generationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Visual Aesthetic Benchmark: Can Frontier Models Judge Beauty?
  2. 2026One Model, Two Minds: Task-Conditioned Reasoning for Unified Image Quality and Aesthetic Assessment
  3. 2026Preferences Order, Ratings Anchor: From Fused Expert Aesthetic Ground Truth to Self-Distillation
  4. 2025AesBiasBench: Evaluating Bias and Alignment in Multimodal Language Models for Personalized Image Aesthetic Assessment
  5. 2025Unlocking the Essence of Beauty: Advanced Aesthetic Reasoning with Relative-Absolute Policy Optimization
  6. 2026Beyond Absolute Scores: Relative Edit-induced Difference for Generalizable Image Aesthetic Assessment
  7. 2026AesCanvas: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for Aesthetic Critique and Contextual Suitability
  8. 2025AesTest: Measuring Aesthetic Intelligence from Perception to Production