mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Image Quality Assessment Dataset for Portraits

arXiv 2304.05772 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2023cs.CVcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Year after year, the demand for ever-better smartphone photos continues to grow, in particular in the domain of portrait photography. Manufacturers thus use perceptual quality criteria throughout the development of smartphone cameras. This costly procedure can be partially replaced by automated learning-based methods for image quality assessment (IQA). Due to its subjective nature, it is necessary to estimate and guarantee the consistency of the IQA process, a characteristic lacking in the mean opinion scores (MOS) widely used for crowdsourcing IQA. In addition, existing blind IQA (BIQA) datasets pay little attention to the difficulty of cross-content assessment, which may degrade the quality of annotations. This paper introduces PIQ23, a portrait-specific IQA dataset of 5116 images of 50 predefined scenarios acquired by 100 smartphones, covering a high variety of brands, models, and use cases. The dataset includes individuals of various genders and ethnicities who have given explicit and informed consent for their photographs to be used in public research. It is annotated by pairwise comparisons (PWC) collected from over 30 image quality experts for three image attributes: face detail preservation, face target exposure, and overall image quality. An in-depth statistical analysis of these annotations allows us to evaluate their consistency over PIQ23. Finally, we show through an extensive comparison with existing baselines that semantic information (image context) can be used to improve IQA predictions. The dataset along with the proposed statistical analysis and BIQA algorithms are available: https://github.com/DXOMARK-Research/PIQ2023

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2023.

Builds on

24 of 76 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  3. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
  4. 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,081
  5. 2022MANIQA: Multi-dimension Attention Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 522
  6. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 355
  7. 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 302
  8. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 223
  9. 2015Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Qualitycited by 209
  10. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 166
  11. 2020Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 134
  12. 2020Face Image Quality Assessment: A Literature Surveycited by 80
12 more
  1. 2020Transformer for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 76
  2. 2016Perceptual Quality Prediction on Authentically Distorted Images Using a Bag of Features Approachcited by 71
  3. 2021Blind Quality Assessment for in-the-Wild Images via Hierarchical Feature Fusion and Iterative Mixed Database Trainingcited by 71
  4. 2021SDD-FIQA: Unsupervised Face Image Quality Assessment with Similarity Distribution Distancecited by 64
  5. 2019FaceQnet: Quality Assessment for Face Recognition based on Deep Learningcited by 62
  6. 2021PPR10K: A Large-Scale Portrait Photo Retouching Dataset with Human-Region Mask and Group-Level Consistencycited by 59
  7. 2017A practical guide and software for analysing pairwise comparison experimentscited by 18
  8. 2020Active Sampling for Pairwise Comparisons via Approximate Message Passing and Information Gain Maximizationcited by 17
  9. 2019Learning to Blindly Assess Image Quality in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 14
  10. 2015The Beauty of Capturing Faces: Rating the Quality of Digital Portraitscited by 5
  11. 2020A multiple attributes image quality database for smartphone camera photo quality assessmentcited by 3
  12. 2020Multi-task deep CNN model for no-reference image quality assessment on smartphone camera photoscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: