mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Preferences Order, Ratings Anchor: From Fused Expert Aesthetic Ground Truth to Self-Distillation

arXiv 2605.19776 ↗First posted 19 May 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Knowledge distillation → Multimodal distillation

Abstract (arXiv)

Pairwise preferences and pointwise ratings are the two dominant annotation protocols in image aesthetic assessment (IAA), yet existing benchmarks adopt only one, leaving their complementarity unmeasured under controlled conditions. We introduce PPaint, a matched dual-protocol benchmark in which 15 domain experts, 5 per category, annotate 150 Chinese paintings under both protocols across five aesthetic dimensions, collecting 45,900 pairwise expert judgments through a locally dense preference design alongside the matched ratings. The matched design reveals complementary strengths: preferences yield more consistent ordinal rankings, while ratings anchor the absolute score scale. Fusing both signals via two independent preference-to-score methods yields a fused expert ground truth on which the two constructions converge to nearly identical scores. The same preference-to-score principle extends to label-free VLM training. PSDistill converts VLM pairwise judgments into calibrated pseudo-scores via an Elo reference pool, and trains the same VLM with confidence-weighted ranking optimization to produce a single-pass aesthetic scorer. Trained on a single painting category, the distilled Qwen3-VL-8B improves mean SRCC from 0.504 to 0.709 across all three categories, outperforming all open-source baselines including the dedicated aesthetic model ArtiMuse and matching closed-source Gemini-3.1-Pro within 0.04 SRCC at single-pass inference cost, with cross-domain transfer further validated on APDDv2. We will release the full PPaint dataset and training code.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal distillation, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation. Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

Builds on

21 of 30 references.

References · 21

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
  3. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
  4. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
  5. 2023Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levelscited by 503
  6. 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 389
  7. 2016Photo Aesthetics Ranking Network with Attributes and Content Adaptationcited by 125
  8. 2025VisualQuality-R1: Reasoning-Induced Image Quality Assessment via Reinforcement Learning to Rankcited by 79
  9. 2024Adaptive Image Quality Assessment via Teaching Large Multimodal Model to Comparecited by 66
  10. 2023VILA: Learning Image Aesthetics from User Comments with Vision-Language Pretrainingcited by 65
  11. 2023Towards Artistic Image Aesthetics Assessment: a Large-scale Dataset and a New Methodcited by 49
  12. 2024UNIAA: A Unified Multi-modal Image Aesthetic Assessment Baseline and Benchmarkcited by 42
9 more
  1. 2025ArtiMuse: Fine-Grained Image Aesthetics Assessment with Joint Scoring and Expert-Level Understandingcited by 41
  2. 2025Pairwise or Pointwise? Evaluating Feedback Protocols for Bias in LLM-Based Evaluationcited by 24
  3. 2023Peering Through Preferences: Unraveling Feedback Acquisition for Aligning Large Language Modelscited by 23
  4. 2024APDDv2: Aesthetics of Paintings and Drawings Dataset with Artist Labeled Scores and Commentscited by 18
  5. 2025Self-Evolving Vision-Language Models for Image Quality Assessment via Voting and Rankingcited by 10
  6. 2026Fine-grained Image Aesthetic Assessment: Learning Discriminative Scores from Relative Rankscited by 5
  7. 2026GenArena: How Can We Achieve Human-Aligned Evaluation for Visual Generation Tasks?cited by 4
  8. 2023Computational Approaches for Traditional Chinese Painting: From the "Six Principles of Painting" Perspectivecited by 3
  9. 2026HanMoVLM: Large Vision-Language Models for Professional Artistic Painting Evaluationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Visual Aesthetic Benchmark: Can Frontier Models Judge Beauty?
  2. 2026TASTE: A Designer-Annotated Multi-Dimensional Preference Dataset for AI-Generated Graphic Design
  3. 2026Personalized Image Aesthetic Assessment via Preference-rich Sample Mining and Cohort Merging
  4. 2026Beyond Absolute Scores: Relative Edit-induced Difference for Generalizable Image Aesthetic Assessment
  5. 2025Unlocking the Essence of Beauty: Advanced Aesthetic Reasoning with Relative-Absolute Policy Optimization
  6. 2024Advancing Comprehensive Aesthetic Insight with Multi-Scale Text-Guided Self-Supervised Learning
  7. 2026AesCanvas: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for Aesthetic Critique and Contextual Suitability
  8. 2025AesTest: Measuring Aesthetic Intelligence from Perception to Production