Co-design Gym: A Unified Benchmark for Embodiment-Policy Co-optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Finding an optimal behaviour policy within a given environment is a widely studied problem in domains as diverse as games, robotics, energy infrastructure, communication networks, and multi-agent systems. Numerous benchmarks have been developed to support such research, but the vast majority assume that the agent's embodiment (design) is fixed, focusing instead on policy learning alone. Lifting this assumption gives rise to a broader class of problems in which optimizing embodiment and policy separately is highly suboptimal. An agent's embodiment strongly shapes which control policies can be discovered, while the optimal embodiment is in turn defined by the policies it admits. To help the research community study this class of problems explicitly and systematically, we introduce Co-Design Gym - a suite of benchmark environments for jointly optimizing embodiment and policy. Our environments span domains such as robotic manipulation and locomotion, multi-robot cooperation, deformable and soft dynamics, video games, electricity grids, wireless networks, F1 racing, multi-agent warehouses, and optimal control, offering 20 environment families (domains), with over 85 distinct co-design presets in total. We further contribute a systematic evaluation of representative co-design algorithms, characterizing the current state of the art. Together, these contributions lay the groundwork for cumulative, comparable progress in co-design.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.
Builds on
27 of 66 references.
References · 27
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
- 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 525
- 2022Evolution Gym: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Evolving Soft Robotscited by 47
- 2021Learning to Jump from Pixelscited by 45
- 2025FastTD3: Simple, Fast, and Capable Reinforcement Learning for Humanoid Controlcited by 44
- 2021Transform2Act: Learning a Transform-and-Control Policy for Efficient Agent Designcited by 38
- 2019Neural Graph Evolution: Towards Efficient Automatic Robot Designcited by 36
- 2023DiffuseBot: Breeding Soft Robots With Physics-Augmented Generative Diffusion Modelscited by 31
- 2021Task-Agnostic Morphology Evolutioncited by 24
- 2021Multi-Objective Graph Heuristic Search for Terrestrial Robot Designcited by 20
- 2023SoftZoo: A Soft Robot Co-design Benchmark For Locomotion In Diverse Environmentscited by 20
15 more
- 2023Efficient automatic design of robotscited by 14
- 2017Functional Co-Optimization of Articulated Robotscited by 11
- 2015A Mathematical Theory of Co-Designcited by 10
- 2025VLMgineer: Vision Language Models as Robotic Toolsmithscited by 10
- 2024Dynamics-Guided Diffusion Model for Sensor-less Robot Manipulator Designcited by 9
- 2025Convergent Functions, Divergent Formscited by 5
- 2025House of Dextra: Cross-embodied Co-design for Dexterous Handscited by 5
- 2025Natural Selection via Foundation Models for Soft Robot Evolutioncited by 4
- 2026Efficient Morphology-Control Co-Design via Stackelberg Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 3
- 2026Transformer Transformer: A Unified Model for Motion-Conditioned Robot Co-designcited by 3
- 2025Agile legged locomotion in reconfigurable modular robotscited by 2
- 2026Efficient and Versatile Quadrupedal Skating: Optimal Co-design via Reinforcement Learning and Bayesian Optimizationcited by 2
- 2026Superhuman Safe and Agile Racing through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026BRIDGE: An Open-Source Humanoid Platform via Morphology-Control Co-Design for Physical AIcited by 1
- 2026AthenaZero: A low-inertia, bimanual robot for dynamic manipulationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.