mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Natural Selection via Foundation Models for Soft Robot Evolution

arXiv 2503.02249 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2025cs.RO cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Designing soft robots is a complex and iterative process that demands cross-disciplinary expertise in materials science, mechanics, and control, often relying on intuition and extensive experimentation. While foundation models, especially Large Language Models (LLMs), have demonstrated impressive reasoning abilities, their capacity to conduct embodied design remains largely unexplored. This paper introduces RoboCrafter-QA, a novel benchmark to evaluate whether LLMs can learn representations of soft robot designs that effectively bridge the gap between high-level task descriptions and low-level morphological and material choices. RoboCrafter-QA leverages the EvoGym simulator to generate a diverse set of soft robot design challenges, spanning robotic locomotion, manipulation, and balancing tasks. Our experiments with SOTA multi-modal LLMs reveal that while these models exhibit promising capabilities in learning design representations, they struggle with fine-grained distinctions between designs with subtle performance differences. To overcome these limitations, we finetune an efficient, open-source LLM that achieves SOTA performance on our benchmark, demonstrating superior capabilities in both design selection and direct generation of high-performing robot morphologies. Furthermore, we construct a physical replica of the modular soft robot and demonstrate a strong sim-to-real correlation, validating that superior benchmark performance has the potential to translate to effective real-world design selection. Our full system will be open-sourced to foster this exciting direction.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.

Builds on

7 of 38 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  4. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  5. 2023Are Large Language Models Really Good Logical Reasoners? A Comprehensive Evaluation and Beyondcited by 65
  6. 2022Evolution Gym: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Evolving Soft Robotscited by 47
  7. 2023Interactive Planning Using Large Language Models for Partially Observable Robotics Taskscited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024RoboMorph: Evolving Robot Morphology using Large Language Models
  2. 2026Bridging Language and Physics: Automated Design of Continuum Robots with Large Language Models ↗
  3. 2024DittoGym: Learning to Control Soft Shape-Shifting Robots
  4. 2026Reinforcement learning in linear embedding space unlocks generalizable control across soft robot configurations
  5. 2025Learning Soft Robotic Dynamics with Active Exploration
  6. 2024Creation of Novel Soft Robot Designs using Generative AI
  7. 2023DiffuseBot: Breeding Soft Robots With Physics-Augmented Generative Diffusion Models
  8. 2025Learning to Crawl: Latent Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Soft Robotic Adaptive Locomotion