Systematic Discovery of Semantic Attacks in Online Map Construction through Conditional Diffusion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous vehicles depend on online HD map construction to perceive lane boundaries, dividers, and pedestrian crossings -- safety-critical road elements that directly govern motion planning. While existing pixel perturbation attacks can disrupt the mapping, they can be neutralized by standard adversarial defenses. We present MIRAGE, a framework for systematic discovery of semantic attacks that bypass adversarial defenses and degrade mapping predictions by finding plausible environmental variation (e.g. shadows, wet roads). MIRAGE exploits the latent manifold of real-world data learned by diffusion models, and searches for semantically mutated scenes neighboring the ground truth with the same road topology yet mislead the mapping predictions. We evaluate MIRAGE on nuScenes and demonstrate two attacks: (1) boundary removal, suppressing 57.7% of detections and corrupting 96% of planned trajectories; and (2) boundary injection, the only method that successfully injects fictitious boundaries, while pixel PGD and AdvPatch fail entirely. Both attacks remain potent under various adversarial defenses. We use two independent VLM judges to quantify realism, where MIRAGE passes as realistic 80--84% of the time (vs. 97--99% for clean nuScenes), while AdvPatch only 0--9%. Our findings expose a categorical gap in current adversarial defenses: semantic-level perturbations that manifest as legitimate environmental variation are substantially harder to mitigate than pixel-level perturbations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.
Builds on
30 of 62 references.
References · 30
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,781
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2022Null-text Inversion for Editing Real Images using Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 1,179
- 2016Training Deep Nets with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 848
- 2020VectorNet: Encoding HD Maps and Agent Dynamics from Vectorized Representationcited by 530
18 more
- 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 520
- 2023End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontierscited by 490
- 2022MapTR: Structured Modeling and Learning for Online Vectorized HD Map Constructioncited by 314
- 2024SparseDrive: End-to-End Autonomous Driving via Sparse Scene Representationcited by 241
- 2016A study of the effect of JPG compression on adversarial imagescited by 197
- 2023MapTRv2: An End-to-End Framework for Online Vectorized HD Map Constructioncited by 193
- 2023Adversarial Example Does Good: Preventing Painting Imitation from Diffusion Models via Adversarial Examplescited by 167
- 2019Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 152
- 2020Physically Realizable Adversarial Examples for LiDAR Object Detectioncited by 137
- 2020Towards Robust LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Driving: General Black-box Adversarial Sensor Attack and Countermeasurescited by 95
- 2022Physical Adversarial Attack meets Computer Vision: A Decade Surveycited by 67
- 2023Does Physical Adversarial Example Really Matter to Autonomous Driving? Towards System-Level Effect of Adversarial Object Evasion Attackcited by 37
- 2020Adversarial Patch Attacks on Monocular Depth Estimation Networkscited by 29
- 2019Fooling Detection Alone is Not Enough: First Adversarial Attack against Multiple Object Trackingcited by 9
- 2023Precise and Generalized Robustness Certification for Neural Networkscited by 4
- 2025Asymmetry Vulnerability and Physical Attacks on Online Map Construction for Autonomous Drivingcited by 4
- 2025SoK: How Sensor Attacks Disrupt Autonomous Vehicles: An End-to-end Analysis, Challenges, and Missed Threatscited by 3
- 2025Physical ID-Transfer Attacks against Multi-Object Tracking via Adversarial Trajectorycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Guided Diffusion-based Generation of Adversarial Objects for Real-World Monocular Depth Estimation Attacks
- 2025CSMapping: Scalable Crowdsourced Semantic Mapping and Topology Inference for Autonomous Driving
- 2026Still Camouflage, Moving Illusion: View-Induced Trajectory Manipulation in Autonomous Driving
- 2026MapDreamer: Aerial Imagery Conditioned Latent Diffusion for Lane-Level Map Generation
- 2025DiffSemanticFusion: Semantic Raster BEV Fusion for Autonomous Driving via Online HD Map Diffusion
- 2024Online Temporal Fusion for Vectorized Map Construction in Mapless Autonomous Driving
- 2025RoadSceneBench: A Lightweight Benchmark for Mid-Level Road Scene Understanding
- 2025Black-Box Adversarial Attack on Vision Language Models for Autonomous Driving