Exorcising ''Wraith'': Protecting LiDAR-based Object Detector in Automated Driving System from Appearing Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated driving systems rely on 3D object detectors to recognize possible obstacles from LiDAR point clouds. However, recent works show the adversary can forge non-existent cars in the prediction results with a few fake points (i.e., appearing attack). By removing statistical outliers, existing defenses are however designed for specific attacks or biased by predefined heuristic rules. Towards more comprehensive mitigation, we first systematically inspect the mechanism of recent appearing attacks: Their common weaknesses are observed in crafting fake obstacles which (i) have obvious differences in the local parts compared with real obstacles and (ii) violate the physical relation between depth and point density. In this paper, we propose a novel plug-and-play defensive module which works by side of a trained LiDAR-based object detector to eliminate forged obstacles where a major proportion of local parts have low objectness, i.e., to what degree it belongs to a real object. At the core of our module is a local objectness predictor, which explicitly incorporates the depth information to model the relation between depth and point density, and predicts each local part of an obstacle with an objectness score. Extensive experiments show, our proposed defense eliminates at least 70% cars forged by three known appearing attacks in most cases, while, for the best previous defense, less than 30% forged cars are eliminated. Meanwhile, under the same circumstance, our defense incurs less overhead for AP/precision on cars compared with existing defenses. Furthermore, We validate the effectiveness of our proposed defense on simulation-based closed-loop control driving tests in the open-source system of Baidu's Apollo.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2023.
Builds on
33 of 51 references.
References · 33
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,384
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,220
- 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,707
- 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
- 2018PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloudcited by 939
- 2019PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detectioncited by 890
- 2018PointCNN: Convolution On X-Transformed Pointscited by 764
21 more
- 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 749
- 2019Deep Learning for 3D Point Clouds: A Surveycited by 557
- 2014Multiple Object Tracking: A Literature Reviewcited by 165
- 2020EPNet: Enhancing Point Features with Image Semantics for 3D Object Detectioncited by 164
- 2018Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectorscited by 163
- 2018ShapeShifter: Robust Physical Adversarial Attack on Faster R-CNN Object Detectorcited by 159
- 2019Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 151
- 2018Generating 3D Adversarial Point Cloudscited by 144
- 2020Physically Realizable Adversarial Examples for LiDAR Object Detectioncited by 137
- 2019LaserNet: An Efficient Probabilistic 3D Object Detector for Autonomous Drivingcited by 133
- 2021Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World Attackscited by 101
- 2020Towards Robust LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Driving: General Black-box Adversarial Sensor Attack and Countermeasurescited by 95
- 2019AdvPC: Transferable Adversarial Perturbations on 3D Point Cloudscited by 84
- 2019Object as Hotspots: An Anchor-Free 3D Object Detection Approach via Firing of Hotspotscited by 84
- 2019Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networkscited by 77
- 2020Probabilistic 3D Multi-Modal, Multi-Object Tracking for Autonomous Drivingcited by 73
- 2019Adversarial Objects Against LiDAR-Based Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 62
- 2020On Isometry Robustness of Deep 3D Point Cloud Models under Adversarial Attackscited by 46
- 2021Security Analysis of Camera-LiDAR Fusion Against Black-Box Attacks on Autonomous Vehiclescited by 26
- 2019Practical Solutions for Machine Learning Safety in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 15
- 2019LU-Net: An Efficient Network for 3D LiDAR Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation Based on End-to-End-Learned 3D Features and U-Netcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2021LiDAR Cluster First and Camera Inference Later: A New Perspective Towards Autonomous Driving
- 2026AD2: Analysis and Detection of Adversarial Threats in Visual Perception for End-to-End Autonomous Driving Systems
- 2026TACTIC: Temporal and Context-Aware LLM Tactical Planning for Roadside LiDAR Attacks
- 2024Zero-shot 3D General Obstacle Detection via Multimodal Foundation Models and Geometry
- 2025Revisiting Adversarial Perception Attacks and Defense Methods on Autonomous Driving Systems
- 2024Optical Lens Attack on Monocular Depth Estimation for Autonomous Driving
- 2025Guided Diffusion-based Generation of Adversarial Objects for Real-World Monocular Depth Estimation Attacks
- 2026AdROD: HyperNetwork-based Adversarially Robust Object Detection for Autonomous Driving