Looped Actor: Depth-Recurrent Reasoning Models for Reinforcement Learning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Looped reasoning models repeatedly apply a shared set of parameters, enabling more computation without increasing the model size. These models also support input-dependent computation by dynamically deciding when to stop looping. Motivated by the recent success of looped transformers in language modeling and reasoning, we investigate whether dynamic looping can similarly benefit sequential decision-making. We provide a complexity-theoretic motivation for this approach by showing that there exist Markov decision processes in which a state-adaptive policy achieves the optimal return with asymptotically less expected computation than any optimal fixed-runtime policy. To learn compute-adaptive policies in practice, we introduce Looped Actor, a transformer-based policy that repeatedly refines a latent representation toward a fixed point using a shared computational block. This allows the model to allocate computation adaptively by varying the number of loops based on the current state. We evaluate Looped Actor on 22 tasks across six environments, ranging from combinatorial puzzles to robotic manipulation and spanning online and offline reinforcement learning (RL) with discrete and continuous actions. Looped Actor matches or exceeds the performance of an untied baseline with 16× more parameters, with the largest gains in environments where action selection requires substantial multistep planning. For the Boxoban environment, we find that the computation allocation is structured: the number of loops increases with the number of remaining pushes and future optimal pushes become increasingly predictable from the latent state over successive loops. Together, these results highlight actor looping as a simple and efficient way to equip RL agents with adaptive computation and improve their planning capabilities. Code is available at https://github.com/camail-official/LoopedActor
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 37 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
37 of 46 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul
Other references · 36
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
- 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 882
- 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 763
- 2016Adaptive Computation Time for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 479
- 2021Brax -- A Differentiable Physics Engine for Large Scale Rigid Body Simulationcited by 375
- 2025Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approachcited by 372
- 2023Looped Transformers as Programmable Computerscited by 224
- 2025Reasoning with Latent Thoughts: On the Power of Looped Transformerscited by 223
- 2024OGBench: Benchmarking Offline Goal-Conditioned RLcited by 216
24 more
- 2016Value Iteration Networkscited by 158
- 2021PonderNet: Learning to Pondercited by 156
- 2025Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Modelscited by 145
- 2023Looped Transformers are Better at Learning Learning Algorithmscited by 135
- 2017Value Prediction Networkcited by 117
- 2024ARC Prize 2024: Technical Reportcited by 103
- 2016The Predictron: End-To-End Learning and Planningcited by 92
- 2024Looped Transformers for Length Generalizationcited by 91
- 2024Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?cited by 82
- 2019An investigation of model-free planningcited by 64
- 2026Loop, Think, & Generalize: Implicit Reasoning in Recurrent-Depth Transformerscited by 34
- 2022End-to-end Algorithm Synthesis with Recurrent Networks: Logical Extrapolation Without Overthinkingcited by 33
- 2018Learning to Search with MCTSnetscited by 32
- 2025Continuous Thought Machinescited by 21
- 2026Fixed-Point Reasoners: Stable and Adaptive Deep Looped Transformerscited by 21
- 2024Planning in a recurrent neural network that plays Sokobancited by 17
- 2023Thinker: Learning to Plan and Actcited by 13
- 2026Equilibrium Reasoners: Learning Attractors Enables Scalable Reasoningcited by 12
- 2026Solve the Loop: Attractor Models for Language and Reasoningcited by 11
- 2026TQL: Scaling Q-Functions with Transformers by Preventing Attention Collapsecited by 9
- 2026From Growing to Looping: A Unified View of Iterative Computation in LLMscited by 6
- 2026On the Role of Computation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2026Looped World Modelscited by 2
- 2026Temporal Recurrence Favors Fewer Layerscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Prioritize the Process, Not Just the Outcome: Rewarding Latent Thought Trajectories Improves Reasoning in Looped Language Models
- 2026LoopRPT: Reinforcement Pre-Training for Looped Language Models
- 2026Recurrent Self-Improvement: Dynamic Cross-Loop On-Policy Distillation for Looped Language Models
- 2026A Mechanistic Analysis of Looped Reasoning Language Models
- 2026LoopFormer: Elastic-Depth Looped Transformers for Latent Reasoning via Shortcut Modulation
- 2026Towards Looped Models Done Right, Part II: Rethinking at Fixed Points
- 2026Adaptive Loops and Memory in Transformers: Think Harder or Know More?
- 2025From Efficiency to Adaptivity: A Deeper Look at Adaptive Reasoning in Large Language Models