TQL: Scaling Q-Functions with Transformers by Preventing Attention Collapse
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite scale driving substantial recent advancements in machine learning, reinforcement learning (RL) methods still primarily use small value functions. Naively scaling value functions -- including with a transformer architecture, which is known to be highly scalable -- often results in learning instability and worse performance. In this work, we ask what prevents transformers from scaling effectively for value functions? Through empirical analysis, we identify the critical failure mode in this scaling: attention scores collapse as capacity increases. Our key insight is that we can effectively prevent this collapse and stabilize training by controlling the entropy of the attention scores, thereby enabling the use of larger models. To this end, we propose Transformer Q-Learning (TQL), a method that unlocks the scaling potential of transformers in learning value functions in RL. Our approach yields up to a 43% improvement in performance when scaling from the smallest to the largest network sizes, while prior methods suffer from performance degradation.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2026.
Builds on
35 of 40 references.
References · 35
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
- 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,724
- 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,528
- 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,425
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
- 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
- 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 882
- 2021CogView: Mastering Text-to-Image Generation via Transformerscited by 691
- 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 690
- 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 654
23 more
- 2020AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasetscited by 647
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning as One Big Sequence Modeling Problemcited by 636
- 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 582
- 2023IDQL: Implicit Q-Learning as an Actor-Critic Method with Diffusion Policiescited by 307
- 2024OGBench: Benchmarking Offline Goal-Conditioned RLcited by 216
- 2023Small-scale proxies for large-scale Transformer training instabilitiescited by 182
- 2017Spectral Norm Regularization for Improving the Generalizability of Deep Learningcited by 178
- 2025Flow Q-Learningcited by 162
- 2023Bigger, Better, Faster: Human-level Atari with human-level efficiencycited by 145
- 2024Stop Regressing: Training Value Functions via Classification for Scalable Deep RLcited by 136
- 2023Q-Transformer: Scalable Offline Reinforcement Learning via Autoregressive Q-Functionscited by 129
- 2021Uncertainty Weighted Actor-Critic for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 125
- 2023Revisiting the Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 121
- 2021Generalized Decision Transformer for Offline Hindsight Information Matchingcited by 105
- 2024Bigger, Regularized, Optimistic: scaling for compute and sample-efficient continuous controlcited by 104
- 2024Mixtures of Experts Unlock Parameter Scaling for Deep RLcited by 75
- 20251000 Layer Networks for Self-Supervised RL: Scaling Depth Can Enable New Goal-Reaching Capabilitiescited by 39
- 2025Stable Gradients for Stable Learning at Scale in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
- 2025floq: Training Critics via Flow-Matching for Scaling Compute in Value-Based RLcited by 20
- 2025HybridNorm: Towards Stable and Efficient Transformer Training via Hybrid Normalizationcited by 15
- 2024Scaling Offline Model-Based RL via Jointly-Optimized World-Action Model Pretrainingcited by 13
- 2025Reinforcement Learning via Implicit Imitation Guidancecited by 12
- 2025Posterior Behavioral Cloning: Pretraining BC Policies for Efficient RL Finetuningcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.
9 papers.
- 2026EXPO-FT: Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning Finetuning for Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 7
- 2026Reinforcement Learning via Value Gradient Flowcited by 4
- 2026FASTER: Value-Guided Sampling for Fast RLcited by 4
- 2026What Does Flow Matching Bring To TD Learning?cited by 2
- 2026Do You Really Need to Pretrain Q-Functions for Online RL Fine-Tuning?cited by 2
- 2026Q-Learning With World Modelscited by 2
- 2026ACSAC: Adaptive Chunk Size Actor-Critic with Causal Transformer Q-Networkcited by 0
- 2026Reinforcement Learning for Real-Time Vision-Language-Action Policiescited by 0
- 2026Looped Actor: Depth-Recurrent Reasoning Models for Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Looped Actor: Depth-Recurrent Reasoning Models for Reinforcement Learning29 Sep 2026
- 2026Reinforcement Learning for Real-Time Vision-Language-Action Policies16 Sep 2026
- 2026Q-Learning With World Models17 Aug 2026
- 2026Do You Really Need to Pretrain Q-Functions for Online RL Fine-Tuning?29 Jul 2026
- 2026EXPO-FT: Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning Finetuning for Vision-Language-Action Models25 May 2026
- 2026ACSAC: Adaptive Chunk Size Actor-Critic with Causal Transformer Q-Network10 May 2026
- 2026FASTER: Value-Guided Sampling for Fast RL21 Apr 2026
- 2026Reinforcement Learning via Value Gradient Flow15 Apr 2026
- 2026What Does Flow Matching Bring To TD Learning?4 Mar 2026