Stabilizing LLM Supervised Fine-Tuning via Explicit Distributional Control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Post-training large language models (LLMs) often suffers from catastrophic forgetting, where improvements on a target objective degrade previously acquired capabilities. Recent evidence suggests that this phenomenon is primarily driven by excessive distributional drift during optimization. Motivated by this perspective, we propose Anchored Learning, a simple framework that explicitly controls distributional updates during offline fine-tuning via a dynamically evolving moving anchor. Instead of matching a fixed reference distribution, the anchor interpolates between the current model and a frozen reference to construct an intermediate target that the model distills toward, transforming global fine-tuning into a sequence of local trust-region updates in distribution space. Theoretically, we prove this anchor-based update admits a linear KL-divergence upper bound per iteration, ensuring a stable transition between model distributions. Extensive experiments on iGSM, MedCalc, and IFEval show that Anchored Learning consistently lies on the Pareto frontier of gain-stability trade-offs, achieving near-optimal performance improvements while substantially reducing degradation compared to strong baselines. For example, while standard SFT suffers from over 53% performance degradation on iGSM and MedCalc, Anchored Learning slashes this drop to under 5% while maintaining near-optimal gains (e.g., 75.2% on iGSM).
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
16 of 18 references.
References · 16
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
- 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 895
- 2024BioMistral: A Collection of Open-Source Pretrained Large Language Models for Medical Domainscited by 299
- 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 162
- 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 121
- 2024Physics of Language Models: Part 2.1, Grade-School Math and the Hidden Reasoning Processcited by 107
- 2024Self-Distillation Bridges Distribution Gap in Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 90
- 2025Retaining by Doing: The Role of On-Policy Data in Mitigating Forgettingcited by 82
4 more
- 2024MedCalc-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models for Medical Calculationscited by 64
- 2024Unveiling the Secret Recipe: A Guide For Supervised Fine-Tuning Small LLMscited by 39
- 2025SFT Doesn't Always Hurt General Capabilities: Revisiting Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning in LLMscited by 23
- 2025Mitigating Forgetting in LLM Fine-Tuning via Low-Perplexity Token Learningcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026SoFT: Soft Targets for Generalizable LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026SoFT: Soft Targets for Generalizable LLM Fine-Tuning26 Sep 2026