Runtime Safety Assurance Using Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The airworthiness and safety of a non-pedigreed autopilot must be verified, but the cost to formally do so can be prohibitive. We can bypass formal verification of non-pedigreed components by incorporating Runtime Safety Assurance (RTSA) as mechanism to ensure safety. RTSA consists of a meta-controller that observes the inputs and outputs of a non-pedigreed component and verifies formally specified behavior as the system operates. When the system is triggered, a verified recovery controller is deployed. Recovery controllers are designed to be safe but very likely disruptive to the operational objective of the system, and thus RTSA systems must balance safety and efficiency. The objective of this paper is to design a meta-controller capable of identifying unsafe situations with high accuracy. High dimensional and non-linear dynamics in which modern controllers are deployed along with the black-box nature of the nominal controllers make this a difficult problem. Current approaches rely heavily on domain expertise and human engineering. We frame the design of RTSA with the Markov decision process (MDP) framework and use reinforcement learning (RL) to solve it. Our learned meta-controller consistently exhibits superior performance in our experiments compared to our baseline, human engineered approach.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
8 papers.
- 2022A Survey on Reinforcement Learning in Aviation Applicationscited by 19
- 2021Minimizing Safety Interference for Safe and Comfortable Automated Driving with Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
- 2025Improving the Resilience of Quadrotors in Underground Environments by Combining Learning-based and Safety Controllerscited by 1
- 2026Learning When to Act: Communication-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Run-Time Assurancecited by 1
- 2026COOL-MC: Verifying and Explaining RL Policies for Platelet Inventory Managementcited by 0
- 2026COOL-MC: Verifying and Explaining RL Policies for Multi-bridge Network Maintenancecited by 0
- 2026Verifiable Foundation Models for Robot Safetycited by 0
- 2026Epi-Logic: A Conceptual Framework for Epistemic Runtime Control, Schema Validity Checking, and Controlled Accommodation in Autonomous AI Agentscited by 0
- 2026Epi-Logic: A Conceptual Framework for Epistemic Runtime Control, Schema Validity Checking, and Controlled Accommodation in Autonomous AI Agents21 Sep 2026
- 2026Verifiable Foundation Models for Robot Safety22 Jun 2026
- 2026Learning When to Act: Communication-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Run-Time Assurance11 May 2026
- 2026COOL-MC: Verifying and Explaining RL Policies for Multi-bridge Network Maintenance8 Mar 2026
- 2026COOL-MC: Verifying and Explaining RL Policies for Platelet Inventory Management2 Mar 2026
- 2025Improving the Resilience of Quadrotors in Underground Environments by Combining Learning-based and Safety Controllers2 Sep 2025
- 2022A Survey on Reinforcement Learning in Aviation Applications3 Nov 2022
- 2021Minimizing Safety Interference for Safe and Comfortable Automated Driving with Distributional Reinforcement Learning15 Jul 2021