BLInD: Learning Driver Intent as a Distribution over Future Ego Trajectories
On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion and flow policies for robotics
Abstract (arXiv)
We present BLInD (Blind Learned Intent Distribution), a compact network that maps recent vehicle-state history (e.g. speed, curvature, indicator, and vehicle type) to a top-k distribution of future ego trajectories, with no camera, LiDAR, map, or object-track inputs. We find that vehiclestate history alone is sufficient to learn a useful multimodal distribution over near-term ego trajectories, and its low-latency nature makes it well-suited for safety-critical deployment. We investigate two distribution architectures, autoregressive (AR) and flow-matching, and train on both mixed-platform opensource and Wayve datasets. Both generalize without datasetspecific adaptation; the flow-matching model achieves best topk ADE/FDE of 0.15/0.37 m on Wayve, 0.15/0.36 m on Waymo, and 0.28/0.59 m on nuScenes, with the AR model reaching comparable coverage. Integrating the distributions into an AEB trigger task, a strict all-candidates policy reduces false positives from 1.51% to 0.11% with AR (13.7x reduction, 94.9% TP) and to 0.06% with flow-matching (25.1x reduction, 98.7% TP) compared to a 1-CTRV policy with 100% true positive score. BLInD runs in 0.87 ms with the AR head and 2.9 ms with the flow-matching head on an NVIDIA DRIVE Orin ECU making it compatible with real-time deployment on automotive ECUs. While existing learned distribution models rely on scene context and blind vehicle-state models typically collapse to a single path, BLInD is learned, blind, and cross-domain simultaneously, a combination not demonstrated by prior work. These results show that such a distribution provides a controllable and plausible intent sampling interface for downstream systems, with AEB as one instantiation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 13 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 20 references.
References · 13
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
- 2019Argoverse: 3D Tracking and Forecasting with Rich Mapscited by 732
- 2013Generating Sequences With Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2021Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Datasetcited by 537
- 2019MultiPath: Multiple Probabilistic Anchor Trajectory Hypotheses for Behavior Predictioncited by 420
- 2018Multimodal Trajectory Predictions for Autonomous Driving using Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 289
- 2019CoverNet: Multimodal Behavior Prediction using Trajectory Setscited by 259
- 2023Is Ego Status All You Need for Open-Loop End-to-End Autonomous Driving?cited by 242
- 2023Rethinking the Open-Loop Evaluation of End-to-End Autonomous Driving in nuScenescited by 191
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Auto-JEPA: A Latent World Model of Continuous Intent for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
- 2021Learning by Watching
- 2025Future-Aware End-to-End Driving: Bidirectional Modeling of Trajectory Planning and Scene Evolution
- 2026A Reliable Context-Aware and Temporal Planning Framework for Autonomous Driving
- 2021ObserveNet Control: A Vision-Dynamics Learning Approach to Predictive Control in Autonomous Vehicles
- 2026Adaptive Time Step Flow Matching for Autonomous Driving Motion Planning
- 2022Distribution-aware Goal Prediction and Conformant Model-based Planning for Safe Autonomous Driving
- 2026DriveFuture: Future-Aware Latent World Models for Autonomous Driving