mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Active Testing: An Efficient and Robust Framework for Estimating Accuracy

arXiv 1807.00493 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2018cs.CVcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Much recent work on visual recognition aims to scale up learning to massive, noisily-annotated datasets. We address the problem of scaling- up the evaluation of such models to large-scale datasets with noisy labels. Current protocols for doing so require a human user to either vet (re-annotate) a small fraction of the test set and ignore the rest, or else correct errors in annotation as they are found through manual inspection of results. In this work, we re-formulate the problem as one of active testing, and examine strategies for efficiently querying a user so as to obtain an accu- rate performance estimate with minimal vetting. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed active testing framework on estimating two performance metrics, Precision@K and mean Average Precision, for two popular computer vision tasks, multi-label classification and instance segmentation. We further show that our approach is able to save significant human annotation effort and is more robust than alternative evaluation protocols.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

15 papers.

Sort: