mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ττ-Bench: An Environment for End-To-End, Realistic Agent Construction

arXiv 2609.04611 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM agents are rapidly becoming production software, deployed to handle customer service, adjudicate disputes, and operate internal systems. Notably, the work of building them is increasingly handed to coding agents, yet existing benchmarks say little about whether an AI system can deliver one under the conditions of a real client engagement. We introduce ττ-bench (pronounced hyper-tau-bench), a benchmark that makes agent construction the task. A developer agent is given the records a business actually keeps, a client who holds requirements, a production API that operations must run through, a codebase to inherit, and limits on serving cost and models: the same starting point a real engagement provides. From these it must deliver a complete customer-service agent, scored by deploying that agent against held-out simulated users. Across 53 tasks spanning four domains, the strongest configuration, Claude Opus 5 under Claude Code, passes just 23.9% of evaluation simulations. Meanwhile, an expert-authored reference ceiling scores 82.2%. The failures mirror ones human agent developers see: models issue shallow queries in place of deep comprehension of the records, communicate almost nothing to the client, and experiment too little with agent architecture and serving spend, shipping the first design that runs. We aim for ττ-bench to turn the work of cooperative agent building into a measurable target for coding agents.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 31 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.

Builds on

31 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Beyond IVR: Benchmarking Customer Support LLM Agents for Business-Adherence2 Jan
  2. 2025UserBench: An Interactive Gym Environment for User-Centric Agents29 Jul
  3. 2025SOP-Bench: Complex Industrial SOPs for Evaluating LLM Agents9 Jun
  4. 2025Darwin Godel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agents29 May
  5. 2025SOPBench: Evaluating Language Agents at Following Standard Operating Procedures and Constraints11 Mar
  6. 2024TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Tasks18 Dec
  7. 2024CRMArena: Understanding the Capacity of LLM Agents to Perform Professional CRM Tasks in Realistic Environments4 Nov
  8. 2024AgentSquare: Automatic LLM Agent Search in Modular Design Space8 Oct
  9. 2024Automated Design of Agentic Systems15 Aug
  10. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains17 Jun

Other references · 21

  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  2. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
  3. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,462
  4. 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 902
  5. 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 627
  6. 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 469
  7. 2024AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generationcited by 432
  8. 2025PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Researchcited by 321
  9. 2025Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolvingcited by 171
  10. 2025SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn 1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering?cited by 105
  11. 2025SWE-PolyBench: A multi-language benchmark for repository level evaluation of coding agentscited by 85
  12. 2024Can Language Models Solve Olympiad Programming?cited by 72
9 more
  1. 2026ProgramBench: Can Language Models Rebuild Programs From Scratch?cited by 59
  2. 2024Commit0: Library Generation from Scratchcited by 52
  3. 2025CRMArena-Pro: Holistic Assessment of LLM Agents Across Diverse Business Scenarios and Interactionscited by 47
  4. 2024Prompting Large Language Models to Tackle the Full Software Development Lifecycle: A Case Studycited by 44
  5. 2026τ-Knowledge: Evaluating Conversational Agents over Unstructured Knowledgecited by 39
  6. 2026RepoZero: Can LLMs Generate a Code Repository from Scratch?cited by 14
  7. 2025IMPersona: Evaluating Individual Level LM Impersonationcited by 11
  8. 2026The Meta-Agent Challenge: Are Current Agents Capable of Autonomous Agent Development?cited by 9
  9. 2026ICAE-Bench: Evaluating Coding Agents as Interactive Project Builderscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AgentSWE: Can Coding Agents Build the Agent You Actually Want?
  2. 2025Continuous Benchmark Generation for Evaluating Enterprise-scale LLM Agents
  3. 2026StartupBench: Benchmarking General-Purpose Agents on Market-Validated End-to-End Workflows
  4. 2026ABC-Bench: Benchmarking Agentic Backend Coding in Real-World Development
  5. 2024AgentQuest: A Modular Benchmark Framework to Measure Progress and Improve LLM Agents
  6. 2026AlphaEval: Evaluating Agents in Production
  7. 2026AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts
  8. 2025Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey