FailSAE: Towards Interpretable Failure Prediction for Vision-Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-language models (VLMs), such as CLIP, have achieved strong performance across multimodal tasks by aligning visual and textual representations in a shared embedding space. As VLMs are increasingly used for high-stakes domains, failure prediction becomes critical for risk-aware deployment and human intervention. Existing failure prediction methods typically rely on confidence scores or auxiliary classifiers. Although these methods are effective on predicting VLM failures, they provide limited interpretability. In this work, we investigate the use of Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) for interpretable failure prediction in VLMs. We formulate failure prediction as a classification task over sparse SAE latent activations and introduce a three-stage failure-aware training pipeline that encourages the learned latent directions to remain interpretable while becoming more informative for failure prediction. Our experiments show that the resulting framework outperforms the evaluated baselines in failure prediction. Further analysis suggests that failure-aware training encourages SAE latent directions to capture more class-specific concepts. We also use the SAE to provide a concept-level analysis of how model representations change during failures, revealing a shift from class-specific concepts toward more ambiguous or style-related concepts. Finally, we explore how the learned SAE latent directions can support runtime failure recovery.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 40 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.
Builds on
40 of 46 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 39
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,588
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,336
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,379
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,902
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,902
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,855
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,068
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,862
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,371
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,391
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,327
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,297
27 more
- 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 825
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 729
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2020Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-distribution Image without Learning from Out-of-distribution Datacited by 408
- 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 405
- 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 360
- 2019SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject Optioncited by 341
- 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
- 2022Delving into Out-of-Distribution Detection with Vision-Language Representationscited by 216
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 214
- 2021Zero-Shot Out-of-Distribution Detection Based on the Pre-trained Model CLIPcited by 151
- 2019Deep Gamblers: Learning to Abstain with Portfolio Theorycited by 70
- 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptationcited by 67
- 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignmentcited by 62
- 2025Interpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoderscited by 58
- 2021DOCTOR: A Simple Method for Detecting Misclassification Errorscited by 53
- 2022A Call to Reflect on Evaluation Practices for Failure Detection in Image Classificationcited by 51
- 2025SAE-V: Interpreting Multimodal Models for Enhanced Alignmentcited by 23
- 2023A Data-Driven Measure of Relative Uncertainty for Misclassification Detectioncited by 14
- 2021Learning to Predict Trustworthiness with Steep Slope Losscited by 11
- 2025ViLU: Learning Vision-Language Uncertainties for Failure Predictioncited by 9
- 2025Interpretable Failure Detection with Human-Level Conceptscited by 7
- 2025Interpreting vision transformers via residual replacement modelcited by 4
- 2024Unveiling AI's Blind Spots: An Oracle for In-Domain, Out-of-Domain, and Adversarial Errorscited by 3
- 2024BB-Patch: BlackBox Adversarial Patch-Attack using Zeroth-Order Optimizationcited by 2
- 2024Can we Defend Against the Unknown? An Empirical Study About Threshold Selection for Neural Network Monitoringcited by 2
- 2026Sparse CLIP: Co-Optimizing Interpretability and Performance in Contrastive Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Discovering Failure Modes in Vision-Language Models using RL
- 2023Identifying and Mitigating Model Failures through Few-shot CLIP-aided Diffusion Generation
- 2025Interpreting the linear structure of vision-language model embedding spaces
- 2025Probing the Representational Power of Sparse Autoencoders in Vision Models
- 2025I-FailSense: Towards General Robotic Failure Detection with Vision-Language Models
- 2026Failing to See or Failing to Know? Attributing Errors in Vision-Language Models
- 2026VLA-Scope: Shift-Aware Failure Prediction for Vision-Language-Action Models