Discovering Failure Modes in Vision-Language Models using RL
On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-language Models (VLMs), despite achieving strong performance on multimodal benchmarks, often misinterpret straightforward visual concepts that humans identify effortlessly, such as counting, spatial reasoning, and viewpoint understanding. Previous studies manually identified these weaknesses and found that they often stem from deficits in specific skills. However, such manual efforts are costly, unscalable, and subject to human bias, which often overlooks subtle details in favour of salient objects, resulting in an incomplete understanding of a model's vulnerabilities. To address these limitations, we propose a Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based framework to automatically discover the failure modes or blind spots of any ``candidate VLM'' on a given data distribution without human intervention. Our framework trains a questioner agent that adaptively generates queries based on the candidate VLM's responses to elicit incorrect answers. Our approach increases question complexity by focusing on fine-grained visual details and distinct skill compositions as training progresses, consequently identifying novel failure modes in which VLMs struggle. We demonstrate the broad applicability of our framework by showcasing its generalizability across various model combinations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 33 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2026.
Builds on
33 of 50 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2025VisPlay: Self-Evolving Vision-Language Models from Images19 Nov
- 2025GRIT: Teaching MLLMs to Think with Images21 May
- 2025VLM-R1: A Stable and Generalizable R1-style Large Vision-Language Model10 Apr
- 2024ConMe: Rethinking Evaluation of Compositional Reasoning for Modern VLMs12 Jun
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?12 Jul
Other references · 28
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
- 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
- 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
- 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
- 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,624
- 2021Ego4D: Around the World in 3,000 Hours of Egocentric Videocited by 1,530
- 2020MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 1,414
16 more
- 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilitiescited by 1,221
- 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 779
- 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 719
- 2023EgoSchema: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Very Long-form Video Language Understandingcited by 666
- 2023HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 572
- 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 529
- 2024MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmarkcited by 494
- 2023V*: Guided Visual Search as a Core Mechanism in Multimodal LLMscited by 459
- 2022The Vendi Score: A Diversity Evaluation Metric for Machine Learningcited by 299
- 2023On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 281
- 2019Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
- 2024OCRBench v2: An Improved Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Visual Text Localization and Reasoningcited by 165
- 2024Vision language models are blind: Failing to translate detailed visual features into wordscited by 144
- 2025ChartQAPro: A More Diverse and Challenging Benchmark for Chart Question Answeringcited by 105
- 2024Curiosity-driven Red-teaming for Large Language Modelscited by 83
- 2024Core Knowledge Deficits in Multi-Modal Language Modelscited by 38
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Revealing Interpretable Failure Modes of VLMscited by 0
- 2026Revealing Interpretable Failure Modes of VLMs12 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Seeing and Solving Are Not Enough for Vision-Language Models
- 2026Failing to See or Failing to Know? Attributing Errors in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Be Faithful When Response: Returning Fluent and Grounded Answers for Vision-Language Models Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Rethinking RL Scaling for Vision Language Models: A Transparent, From-Scratch Framework and Comprehensive Evaluation Scheme
- 2026Seeing is not Enough: Vision-Language Models Perceive Evidence but Fail to Act
- 2026Seeing Isn't Believing: Uncovering Blind Spots in Evaluator Vision-Language Models
- 2024Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models
- 2026AMVICC: A Novel Benchmark for Cross-Modal Failure Mode Profiling for VLMs and IGMs