mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PRISM: An Agentic Multi-Model Architecture for Proactive Safety in Autonomous Transportation Systems

arXiv 2609.01623 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2026cs.MA cs.CV cs.ETcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous and intelligent transportation systems operate in complex urban environments where safety depends on interactions among vehicle behavior, environmental conditions, and vulnerable road users (VRUs) such as pedestrians and cyclists. Most advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) employ reactive mechanisms that activate only after hazards have emerged, a critical limitation underscored by rising VRU fatalities in the United States. This study introduces PRISM (Proactive Risk Intelligence and Safety Management), an agentic multi-model safety architecture that transitions from reactive crash avoidance to proactive, continuous risk management. PRISM employs inverse crash-probability modeling to convert binary crash classifiers into dynamic, interpretable safety scores. Three specialized models addressing trajectory kinematics, environmental risk, and VRU interaction operate concurrently, coordinated by a reasoning layer incorporating reinforcement learning, contextual memory, and feature-level attribution. The system provides graduated safety interventions across four tiers, from silent monitoring to emergency alerts. Unlike rule-based systems with static thresholds, PRISM dynamically adjusts safety parameters in real time. Validated across 1,296 scenarios from three naturalistic driving datasets without dataset-specific retraining, the system yielded a mean safety score of 68 out of 100, classified 77.6% of scenarios as advisory, and flagged a near-miss rate of 3.8%, with 11% of scenarios escalating to intervention or emergency response. Feature attribution consistently identified trajectory risk and VRU proximity as primary safety factors. PRISM provides a unified, interpretable framework for proactive transportation safety with emphasis on VRU risk reduction in dense urban environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

Builds on

6 of 13 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  3. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 721
  4. 2023Argoverse 2: Next Generation Datasets for Self-Driving Perception and Forecastingcited by 707
  5. 2021Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Datasetcited by 537
  6. 2026Real-Time Driver Safety Scoring Through Inverse Crash Probability Modelingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026CRASH: Cognitive Reasoning Agent for Safety Hazards in Autonomous Driving
  2. 2025DRAMA-X: A Fine-grained Intent Prediction and Risk Reasoning Benchmark For Driving
  3. 2026Towards Safer Autonomous Driving in an Open World: A Dual-Process Approach
  4. 2025From Camera-Based Sensing to Reasoning: A Comprehensive Review Toward Proactive Vulnerable Road User Safety
  5. 2025Drive in Corridors: Enhancing the Safety of End-to-end Autonomous Driving via Corridor Learning and Planning
  6. 2025Context-aware Risk Assessment and Its Application in Autonomous Driving
  7. 2026SafeDrive: Fine-Grained Safety Reasoning for End-to-End Driving in a Sparse World
  8. 2025MARBLE: A Multi-Agent Rule-Based LLM Reasoning Engine for Accident Severity Prediction