MARBLE: A Multi-Agent Rule-Based LLM Reasoning Engine for Accident Severity Prediction
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Accident severity prediction plays a critical role in transportation safety systems but is a persistently difficult task due to incomplete data, strong feature dependencies, and severe class imbalance in which rare but high-severity cases are underrepresented and hard to detect. Existing methods often rely on monolithic models or black box prompting, which struggle to scale in noisy, real-world settings and offer limited interpretability. To address these challenges, we propose MARBLE a multiagent rule based LLM engine that decomposes the severity prediction task across a team of specialized reasoning agents, including an interchangeable ML-backed agent. Each agent focuses on a semantic subset of features (e.g., spatial, environmental, temporal), enabling scoped reasoning and modular prompting without the risk of prompt saturation. Predictions are coordinated through either rule-based or LLM-guided consensus mechanisms that account for class rarity and confidence dynamics. The system retains structured traces of agent-level reasoning and coordination outcomes, supporting in-depth interpretability and post-hoc performance diagnostics. Across both UK and US datasets, MARBLE consistently outperforms traditional machine learning classifiers and state-of-the-art (SOTA) prompt-based reasoning methods including Chain-of-Thought (CoT), Least-to-Most (L2M), and Tree-of-Thought (ToT) achieving nearly 90% accuracy where others plateau below 48%. This performance redefines the practical ceiling for accident severity classification under real world noise and extreme class imbalance. Our results position MARBLE as a generalizable and interpretable framework for reasoning under uncertainty in safety-critical applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2025.
Builds on
21 of 39 references.
References · 21
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,397
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,173
- 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 873
9 more
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 530
- 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 489
- 2025Chain of Draft: Thinking Faster by Writing Lesscited by 290
- 2022Teaching Small Language Models to Reasoncited by 279
- 2020Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Taskscited by 207
- 2023Symbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation: Small Models Can Also "Think" Step-by-Stepcited by 144
- 2019A Countrywide Traffic Accident Datasetcited by 18
- 2024Distilling Mathematical Reasoning Capabilities into Small Language Modelscited by 14
- 2025Recursive Decomposition of Logical Thoughts: Framework for Superior Reasoning and Knowledge Propagation in Large Language Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026TransportAgents: a multi-agents LLM framework for traffic accident severity prediction
- 2026DRAFT: Task Decoupled Latent Reasoning for Agent Safety
- 2025Towards Safety Reasoning in LLMs: AI-agentic Deliberation for Policy-embedded CoT Data Creation
- 2026CRASH: Cognitive Reasoning Agent for Safety Hazards in Autonomous Driving
- 2024Leveraging Large Language Models with Chain-of-Thought and Prompt Engineering for Traffic Crash Severity Analysis and Inference
- 2026Dual-Stage LLM Framework for Scenario-Centric Semantic Interpretation in Driving Assistance
- 2025AgentAuditor: Human-Level Safety and Security Evaluation for LLM Agents
- 2025RADAR: A Risk-Aware Dynamic Multi-Agent Framework for LLM Safety Evaluation via Role-Specialized Collaboration