Cal or No Cal? -- Real-Time Miscalibration Detection of LiDAR and Camera Sensors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The goal of extrinsic calibration is the alignment of sensor data to ensure an accurate representation of the surroundings and enable sensor fusion applications. From a safety perspective, sensor calibration is a key enabler of autonomous driving. In the current state of the art, a trend from target-based offline calibration towards targetless online calibration can be observed. However, online calibration is subject to strict real-time and resource constraints which are not met by state-of-the-art methods. This is mainly due to the high number of parameters to estimate, the reliance on geometric features, or the dependence on specific vehicle maneuvers. To meet these requirements and ensure the vehicle's safety at any time, we propose a miscalibration detection framework that shifts the focus from the direct regression of calibration parameters to a binary classification of the calibration state, i.e., calibrated or miscalibrated. Therefore, we propose a contrastive learning approach that compares embedded features in a latent space to classify the calibration state of two different sensor modalities. Moreover, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the feature embeddings and challenging calibration errors that highlight the performance of our approach. As a result, our method outperforms the current state-of-the-art in terms of detection performance, inference time, and resource demand. The code is open source and available on https://github.com/TUMFTM/MiscalibrationDetection.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2025.
Builds on
17 of 39 references.
References · 17
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
- 2022BEVFusion: Multi-Task Multi-Sensor Fusion with Unified Bird's-Eye View Representationcited by 850
- 2019Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representationscited by 808
- 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
- 2022TransFusion: Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection with Transformerscited by 466
- 2023Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Drivingcited by 114
- 2023SparseFusion: Fusing Multi-Modal Sparse Representations for Multi-Sensor 3D Object Detectioncited by 83
- 2017RegNet: Multimodal Sensor Registration Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 69
- 2022Benchmarking the Robustness of LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 50
5 more
- 2021Pixel-level Extrinsic Self Calibration of High Resolution LiDAR and Camera in Targetless Environmentscited by 49
- 2023GraphAlign: Enhancing Accurate Feature Alignment by Graph matching for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detectioncited by 34
- 2021CRLF: Automatic Calibration and Refinement based on Line Feature for LiDAR and Camera in Road Scenescited by 19
- 2023SOAC: Spatio-Temporal Overlap-Aware Multi-Sensor Calibration using Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 13
- 2023Learned Fusion: 3D Object Detection using Calibration-Free Transformer Feature Fusioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.