Detecting and Identifying Optical Signal Attacks on Autonomous Driving Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
For autonomous driving, an essential task is to detect surrounding objects accurately. To this end, most existing systems use optical devices, including cameras and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors, to collect environment data in real time. In recent years, many researchers have developed advanced machine learning models to detect surrounding objects. Nevertheless, the aforementioned optical devices are vulnerable to optical signal attacks, which could compromise the accuracy of object detection. To address this critical issue, we propose a framework to detect and identify sensors that are under attack. Specifically, we first develop a new technique to detect attacks on a system that consists of three sensors. Our main idea is to: 1) use data from three sensors to obtain two versions of depth maps (i.e., disparity) and 2) detect attacks by analyzing the distribution of disparity errors. In our study, we use real data sets and the state-of-the-art machine learning model to evaluate our attack detection scheme and the results confirm the effectiveness of our detection method. Based on the detection scheme, we further develop an identification model that is capable of identifying up to n-2 attacked sensors in a system with one LiDAR and n cameras. We prove the correctness of our identification scheme and conduct experiments to show the accuracy of our identification method. Finally, we investigate the overall sensitivity of our framework.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2021.
Builds on
12 of 28 references.
References · 12
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,625
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,655
- 2018PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloudcited by 939
- 2015A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimationcited by 879
- 2018Deep Ordinal Regression Network for Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 722
- 2018Pyramid Stereo Matching Networkcited by 489
- 2018Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 455
- 2019PIXOR: Real-time 3D Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 358
- 2016Speed/accuracy trade-offs for modern convolutional object detectorscited by 198
- 2019Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 151
- 2019Monocular Depth Estimation: A Surveycited by 37
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Illusory Attacks: Information-Theoretic Detectability Matters in Adversarial Attackscited by 12
- 2023Uncertainty-Encoded Multi-Modal Fusion for Robust Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 6
- 2022Sensor Data Validation and Driving Safety in Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 3
- 2026Adversarial Calibration Attack on Autonomous Vehiclescited by 0
- 2026Adversarial Calibration Attack on Autonomous Vehicles28 Aug 2026
- 2023Uncertainty-Encoded Multi-Modal Fusion for Robust Object Detection in Autonomous Driving30 Jul 2023
- 2022Illusory Attacks: Information-Theoretic Detectability Matters in Adversarial Attacks20 Jul 2022
- 2022Sensor Data Validation and Driving Safety in Autonomous Driving Systems30 Mar 2022