FISGuard: Defending Against Membership Inference via Fixed Input Subspaces
On the map: LLM safety and security → Federated unlearning and poisoning
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language models are increasingly adopted in federated learning, protecting user privacy while performing parameter-efficient fine-tuning on distributed private data has become an important challenge. Although clients only share gradients instead of directly uploading raw data, the shared gradients may still leak membership information about training samples. ProjRes (S&P, 2026) further increases this risk: with less information and without accessing model outputs, an attacker can effectively distinguish members from non-members solely based on the projection residual between a candidate representation and the subspace induced by server-observable gradients. Existing defenses against membership inference mostly rely on gradient perturbation or regularization, which can not only degrade model utility but also fail to effectively defend against the membership inference attack introduced by ProjRes, which exploits the geometric structure of gradients. To address this issue, we propose FISGuard, a lightweight defense. Its key idea is to construct and fix a low-dimensional representation subspace using independent public data, thereby restricting the space through which private representations are exposed via gradients while preserving the primary information required for downstream tasks. This substantially reduces the projection-residual discrepancy between members and non-members. We evaluate FISGuard against five representative defense methods across three NLP datasets, two LLMs, and two fine-tuning strategies, Adapter and LoRA. The results show that FISGuard reduces the ProjRes attack AUC to near the random-guessing level of 0.5 in most settings, while maintaining downstream task performance close to that of the undefended model and introducing only limited computational overhead, thereby achieving a favorable privacy--utility trade-off.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.
Builds on
18 of 30 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 17
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 321
- 2018Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularizationcited by 186
- 2016Practical Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning on User-Held Datacited by 178
- 2023FederatedScope-LLM: A Comprehensive Package for Fine-tuning Large Language Models in Federated Learningcited by 149
- 2020Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric Perspectivecited by 142
- 2020Local and Central Differential Privacy for Robustness and Privacy in Federated Learningcited by 78
- 2025Towards Label-Only Membership Inference Attack against Pre-trained Large Language Modelscited by 37
- 2021Scaling Federated Learning for Fine-tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 36
- 2021Privacy Regularization: Joint Privacy-Utility Optimization in Language Modelscited by 30
- 2020An Accuracy-Lossless Perturbation Method for Defending Privacy Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 19
- 2020Federated pretraining and fine tuning of BERT using clinical notes from multiple siloscited by 18
5 more
- 2024Privacy in Fine-tuning Large Language Models: Attacks, Defenses, and Future Directionscited by 14
- 2022MIAShield: Defending Membership Inference Attacks via Preemptive Exclusion of Memberscited by 6
- 2023Towards the Flatter Landscape and Better Generalization in Federated Learning under Client-level Differential Privacycited by 5
- 2023Little is Enough: Boosting Privacy by Sharing Only Hard Labels in Federated Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 5
- 2026Toward Efficient Membership Inference Attacks against Federated Large Language Models: A Projection Residual Approachcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Membership Information Leakage in Federated Contrastive Learning
- 2024Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning: A Survey
- 2023MIST: Defending Against Membership Inference Attacks Through Membership-Invariant Subspace Training
- 2025An Efficient Gradient-Based Inference Attack for Federated Learning
- 2026Res-MIA: A Training-Free Resolution-Based Membership Inference Attack on Federated Learning Models
- 2022Perfectly Accurate Membership Inference by a Dishonest Central Server in Federated Learning
- 2025Theoretically Unmasking Inference Attacks Against LDP-Protected Clients in Federated Vision Models
- 2025Who Owns This Sample: Cross-Client Membership Inference Attack in Federated Graph Neural Networks