MIAShield: Defending Membership Inference Attacks via Preemptive Exclusion of Members
On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
In membership inference attacks (MIAs), an adversary observes the predictions of a model to determine whether a sample is part of the model's training data. Existing MIA defenses conceal the presence of a target sample through strong regularization, knowledge distillation, confidence masking, or differential privacy. We propose MIAShield, a new MIA defense based on preemptive exclusion of member samples instead of masking the presence of a member. The key insight in MIAShield is weakening the strong membership signal that stems from the presence of a target sample by preemptively excluding it at prediction time without compromising model utility. To that end, we design and evaluate a suite of preemptive exclusion oracles leveraging model-confidence, exact or approximate sample signature, and learning-based exclusion of member data points. To be practical, MIAShield splits a training data into disjoint subsets and trains each subset to build an ensemble of models. The disjointedness of subsets ensures that a target sample belongs to only one subset, which isolates the sample to facilitate the preemptive exclusion goal. We evaluate MIAShield on three benchmark image classification datasets. We show that MIAShield effectively mitigates membership inference (near random guess) for a wide range of MIAs, achieves far better privacy-utility trade-off compared with state-of-the-art defenses, and remains resilient against an adaptive adversary.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 26 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2022.
Builds on
26 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2021Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks by Self-Distillation Through a Novel Ensemble Architecture15 Oct
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey14 Mar
- 2021PRICURE: Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Inference in a Multi-Party Setting19 Feb
Other references · 23
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
- 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
- 2020Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 371
- 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 347
- 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 328
- 2020Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Modelscited by 273
11 more
- 2018Scalable Private Learning with PATEcited by 266
- 2019MemGuard: Defending against Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial Examplescited by 183
- 2018Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularizationcited by 177
- 2020Membership Leakage in Label-Only Exposurescited by 156
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noisecited by 114
- 2020Revisiting Membership Inference Under Realistic Assumptionscited by 108
- 2018Towards Demystifying Membership Inference Attackscited by 39
- 2020Defending Model Inversion and Membership Inference Attacks via Prediction Purificationcited by 32
- 2020Improving Deep Learning with Differential Privacy using Gradient Encoding and Denoisingcited by 30
- 2017Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization with Input Perturbationcited by 19
- 2021DP-UTIL: Comprehensive Utility Analysis of Differential Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023ORL-AUDITOR: Dataset Auditing in Offline Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
- 2022On the Vulnerability of Data Points under Multiple Membership Inference Attacks and Target Modelscited by 2
- 2025A hierarchical approach for assessing the vulnerability of tree-based classification models to membership inference attackcited by 2
- 2025SoK: Can Synthetic Images Replace Real Data? A Survey of Utility and Privacy of Synthetic Image Generationcited by 1
- 2026AI Security in the Foundation Model Era: A Comprehensive Survey from a Unified Perspectivecited by 1
- 2026FISGuard: Defending Against Membership Inference via Fixed Input Subspacescited by 0
- 2026FISGuard: Defending Against Membership Inference via Fixed Input Subspaces28 Aug 2026
- 2026AI Security in the Foundation Model Era: A Comprehensive Survey from a Unified Perspective25 Mar 2026
- 2025SoK: Can Synthetic Images Replace Real Data? A Survey of Utility and Privacy of Synthetic Image Generation24 Jun 2025
- 2025A hierarchical approach for assessing the vulnerability of tree-based classification models to membership inference attack13 Feb 2025
- 2023ORL-AUDITOR: Dataset Auditing in Offline Deep Reinforcement Learning6 Sep 2023
- 2022On the Vulnerability of Data Points under Multiple Membership Inference Attacks and Target Models28 Oct 2022