mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Accuracy-Lossless Perturbation Method for Defending Privacy Attacks in Federated Learning

arXiv 2002.09843 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2020cs.LG cs.CR cs.CVcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although federated learning improves privacy of training data by exchanging local gradients or parameters rather than raw data, the adversary still can leverage local gradients and parameters to obtain local training data by launching reconstruction and membership inference attacks. To defend such privacy attacks, many noises perturbation methods (like differential privacy or CountSketch matrix) have been widely designed. However, the strong defence ability and high learning accuracy of these schemes cannot be ensured at the same time, which will impede the wide application of FL in practice (especially for medical or financial institutions that require both high accuracy and strong privacy guarantee). To overcome this issue, in this paper, we propose an efficient model perturbation method for federated learning to defend reconstruction and membership inference attacks launched by curious clients. On the one hand, similar to the differential privacy, our method also selects random numbers as perturbed noises added to the global model parameters, and thus it is very efficient and easy to be integrated in practice. Meanwhile, the random selected noises are positive real numbers and the corresponding value can be arbitrarily large, and thus the strong defence ability can be ensured. On the other hand, unlike differential privacy or other perturbation methods that cannot eliminate the added noises, our method allows the server to recover the true gradients by eliminating the added noises. Therefore, our method does not hinder learning accuracy at all.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 9; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Survey on Federated Learning Threats: concepts, taxonomy on attacks and defences, experimental study and challengescited by 81
  2. 2023Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: on the Perspective of Trade-offcited by 26
  3. 2023A Survey of What to Share in Federated Learning: Perspectives on Model Utility, Privacy Leakage, and Communication Efficiencycited by 21
  4. 2023Vertical Federated Knowledge Transfer via Representation Distillation for Healthcare Collaboration Networkscited by 19
  5. 2023BAFFLE: A Baseline of Backpropagation-Free Federated Learningcited by 12
  6. 2023A Survey on Vulnerability of Federated Learning: A Learning Algorithm Perspectivecited by 9
  7. 2022FedDef: Defense Against Gradient Leakage in Federated Learning-based Network Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 6
  8. 2022Over-the-Air Federated Learning with Privacy Protection via Correlated Additive Perturbationscited by 5
  9. 2023Gradient Leakage Defense with Key-Lock Module for Federated Learningcited by 4
  10. 2023An Efficient Federated Learning Framework for Training Semantic Communication Systemcited by 4
  11. 2024An Adaptive Differential Privacy Method Based on Federated Learningcited by 3
  12. 2022Perfectly Accurate Membership Inference by a Dishonest Central Server in Federated Learningcited by 2
6 more
  1. 2024Gradients Stand-in for Defending Deep Leakage in Federated Learningcited by 2
  2. 2023Regulating Clients' Noise Adding in Federated Learning without Verificationcited by 0
  3. 2023An Efficient and Multi-private Key Secure Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 0
  4. 2024OmniLytics+: A Secure, Efficient, and Affordable Blockchain Data Market for Machine Learning through Off-Chain Processingcited by 0
  5. 2024Efficiently Achieving Secure Model Training and Secure Aggregation to Ensure Bidirectional Privacy-Preservation in Federated Learningcited by 0
  6. 2026FISGuard: Defending Against Membership Inference via Fixed Input Subspacescited by 0