Little is Enough: Boosting Privacy by Sharing Only Hard Labels in Federated Semi-Supervised Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many critical applications, sensitive data is inherently distributed and cannot be centralized due to privacy concerns. A wide range of federated learning approaches have been proposed to train models locally at each client without sharing their sensitive data, typically by exchanging model parameters, or probabilistic predictions (soft labels) on a public dataset or a combination of both. However, these methods still disclose private information and restrict local models to those that can be trained using gradient-based methods. We propose a federated co-training (FedCT) approach that improves privacy by sharing only definitive (hard) labels on a public unlabeled dataset. Clients use a consensus of these shared labels as pseudo-labels for local training. This federated co-training approach empirically enhances privacy without compromising model quality. In addition, it allows the use of local models that are not suitable for parameter aggregation in traditional federated learning, such as gradient-boosted decision trees, rule ensembles, and random forests. Furthermore, we observe that FedCT performs effectively in federated fine-tuning of large language models, where its pseudo-labeling mechanism is particularly beneficial. Empirical evaluations and theoretical analyses suggest its applicability across a range of federated learning scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2023.
Builds on
38 of 82 references.
References · 38
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 766
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
- 2020Ensemble Distillation for Robust Model Fusion in Federated Learningcited by 682
- 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 633
- 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 552
26 more
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
- 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 459
- 2019FedMD: Heterogenous Federated Learning via Model Distillationcited by 459
- 2021Data-Free Knowledge Distillation for Heterogeneous Federated Learningcited by 383
- 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 348
- 2019Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?cited by 255
- 2015Semi-Supervised Learning with Ladder Networkscited by 247
- 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 224
- 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 210
- 2020FedBE: Making Bayesian Model Ensemble Applicable to Federated Learningcited by 176
- 2020Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descent on Nonsmooth Convex Lossescited by 173
- 2020Membership Leakage in Label-Only Exposurescited by 168
- 2020Distillation-Based Semi-Supervised Federated Learning for Communication-Efficient Collaborative Training with Non-IID Private Datacited by 125
- 2021Deep Learning with Label Differential Privacycited by 117
- 2020Relative Flatness and Generalizationcited by 88
- 2022Heterogeneous Ensemble Knowledge Transfer for Training Large Models in Federated Learningcited by 81
- 2020ML Privacy Meter: Aiding Regulatory Compliance by Quantifying the Privacy Risks of Machine Learningcited by 70
- 2019On Safeguarding Privacy and Security in the Framework of Federated Learningcited by 55
- 2021SemiFL: Semi-Supervised Federated Learning for Unlabeled Clients with Alternate Trainingcited by 45
- 2022Preserving Privacy in Federated Learning with Ensemble Cross-Domain Knowledge Distillationcited by 45
- 2018Efficient Decentralized Deep Learning by Dynamic Model Averagingcited by 30
- 2021SemiFed: Semi-supervised Federated Learning with Consistency and Pseudo-Labelingcited by 29
- 2023The Best of Both Worlds: Accurate Global and Personalized Models through Federated Learning with Data-Free Hyper-Knowledge Distillationcited by 25
- 2017Pain-Free Random Differential Privacy with Sensitivity Samplingcited by 7
- 2019Communication-Efficient Distributed Online Learning with Kernelscited by 4
- 2022Differentially Private Deep Learning with ModelMixcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2025Whom to Trust? Adaptive Collaboration in Personalized Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026COSMOS: Model-Agnostic Personalized Federated Learning with Clustered Server Models and Pseudo-Label-Only Communicationcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Parameter Aggregation: Semantic Consensus for Federated Fine-Tuning of LLMscited by 0
- 2026FedCC: Towards Addressing Label Distribution Skews in Distillation-Based Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026FISGuard: Defending Against Membership Inference via Fixed Input Subspacescited by 0
- 2026FISGuard: Defending Against Membership Inference via Fixed Input Subspaces28 Aug 2026
- 2026FedCC: Towards Addressing Label Distribution Skews in Distillation-Based Federated Learning24 Aug 2026
- 2026Beyond Parameter Aggregation: Semantic Consensus for Federated Fine-Tuning of LLMs12 May 2026
- 2026COSMOS: Model-Agnostic Personalized Federated Learning with Clustered Server Models and Pseudo-Label-Only Communication11 May 2026
- 2025Whom to Trust? Adaptive Collaboration in Personalized Federated Learning30 Jun 2025