mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Efficient Gradient-Based Inference Attack for Federated Learning

arXiv 2512.15143 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Federated unlearning and poisoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning is a machine learning setting that reduces direct data exposure, improving the privacy guarantees of machine learning models. Yet, the exchange of model updates between the participants and the aggregator can still leak sensitive information. In this work, we present a new gradient-based membership inference attack for federated learning scenarios that exploits the temporal evolution of last-layer gradients across multiple federated rounds. Our method uses the shadow technique to learn round-wise gradient patterns of the training records, requiring no access to the private dataset, and is designed to consider both semi-honest and malicious adversaries (aggregators or data owners). Beyond membership inference, we also provide a natural extension of the proposed attack to discrete attribute inference by contrasting gradient responses under alternative attribute hypotheses. The proposed attacks are model-agnostic, and therefore applicable to any gradient-based model and can be applied to both classification and regression settings. We evaluate the attack on CIFAR-100 and Purchase100 datasets for membership inference and on Breast Cancer Wisconsin for attribute inference. Our findings reveal strong attack performance and comparable computational and memory overhead in membership inference when compared to another attack from the literature. The obtained results emphasize that multi-round federated learning can increase the vulnerability to inference attacks, that aggregators pose a more substantial threat than data owners, and that attack performance is strongly influenced by the nature of the training dataset, with richer, high-dimensional data leading to stronger leakage than simpler tabular data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 8 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2025.

Builds on

8 of 20 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021Efficient passive membership inference attack in federated learning31 Oct

Other references · 7

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  3. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 878
  4. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 498
  5. 2020Revisiting Membership Inference Under Realistic Assumptionscited by 112
  6. 2022Geographic Spines in the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance Systemcited by 44
  7. 2021A Novel Attribute Reconstruction Attack in Federated Learningcited by 18

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning: A Survey
  2. 2022Perfectly Accurate Membership Inference by a Dishonest Central Server in Federated Learning
  3. 2025Securing Genomic Data Against Inference Attacks in Federated Learning Environments
  4. 2024FedMIA: An Effective Membership Inference Attack Exploiting "All for One" Principle in Federated Learning
  5. 2023MIA-BAD: An Approach for Enhancing Membership Inference Attack and its Mitigation with Federated Learning
  6. 2026Evaluating Differential Privacy Against Membership Inference in Federated Learning: Insights from the NIST Genomics Red Team Challenge
  7. 2023Source Inference Attacks: Beyond Membership Inference Attacks in Federated Learning
  8. 2025Who Owns This Sample: Cross-Client Membership Inference Attack in Federated Graph Neural Networks