mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AcCoRD: Evaluating User-Agent Collaboration Under Realistic User Preference Dynamics

arXiv 2608.27818 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

User preferences in user-agent collaboration are rarely static and fully-specified upfront: preferences are formed, revealed, adjusted, and relaxed during interaction. Existing benchmarks for evaluating user-agent collaboration focus almost exclusively on resolving underspecified preferences, thereby failing to capture the richer dynamics of real-world interaction. We introduce AcCoRD, a user-agent collaboration benchmark requiring agents to handle diverse user preference dynamics in two domains: online shopping and travel planning. We evaluate five frontier LLMs under two prompting strategies: vanilla ReAct, and an uncertainty-guided variant that prompts models to identify and resolve ambiguity about user preferences. Our results reveal that frontier models can handle underspecification but struggle to satisfy preferences that emerge or evolve mid-interaction and require more sophisticated uncertainty modeling. Further, prompting alone fails to elicit the required uncertainty recognition. We release AcCoRD as a resource for developing agents that can navigate the full complexity of real-world user preferences.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 34 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.

Builds on

34 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Ask or Assume? Uncertainty-Aware Clarification-Seeking in Coding Agents27 Mar
  2. 2025Structured Uncertainty guided Clarification for LLM Agents11 Nov
  3. 2025Training Proactive and Personalized LLM Agents4 Nov
  4. 2025UserBench: An Interactive Gym Environment for User-Centric Agents29 Jul
  5. 2024Collaborative Gym: A Framework for Enabling and Evaluating Human-Agent Collaboration20 Dec
  6. 2024TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Tasks18 Dec
  7. 2024CRMArena: Understanding the Capacity of LLM Agents to Perform Professional CRM Tasks in Realistic Environments4 Nov
  8. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains17 Jun
  9. 2024ChatShop: Interactive Information Seeking with Language Agents15 Apr
  10. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents22 Aug

Other references · 24

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  4. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
  5. 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,251
  6. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,195
  7. 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 815
  8. 2018MultiWOZ -- A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modellingcited by 766
  9. 2019Towards Scalable Multi-domain Conversational Agents: The Schema-Guided Dialogue Datasetcited by 434
  10. 2024AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agentscited by 401
  11. 2024ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilitiescited by 295
  12. 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 238
12 more
  1. 2025CollabLLM: From Passive Responders to Active Collaboratorscited by 124
  2. 2025SWEET-RL: Training Multi-Turn LLM Agents on Collaborative Reasoning Taskscited by 118
  3. 2018Conversational Recommender Systemcited by 115
  4. 2020Estimation-Action-Reflection: Towards Deep Interaction Between Conversational and Recommender Systemscited by 98
  5. 2023Clarify When Necessary: Resolving Ambiguity Through Interaction with LMscited by 98
  6. 2023Eliciting Human Preferences with Language Modelscited by 92
  7. 2026Lost in Simulation: LLM-Simulated Users are Unreliable Proxies for Human Users in Agentic Evaluationscited by 40
  8. 2025Ambig-SWE: Interactive Agents to Overcome Underspecificity in Software Engineeringcited by 38
  9. 2025UserRL: Training Interactive User-Centric Agent via Reinforcement Learningcited by 32
  10. 2024On Overcoming Miscalibrated Conversational Priors in LLM-based Chatbotscited by 24
  11. 2024Bayesian Optimization with LLM-Based Acquisition Functions for Natural Language Preference Elicitationcited by 17
  12. 2025Asking Clarifying Questions for Preference Elicitation With Large Language Modelscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PrefIx: Understand and Adapt to User Preference in Human-Agent Interaction
  2. 2026VitaBench 2.0: Evaluating Personalized and Proactive Agents in Long-Term User Interactions
  3. 2026The Behavioral Fabric of LLM-Powered GUI Agents: Human Values and Interaction Outcomes
  4. 2026SimGuide: Typed Multi-Context User Representations for Preference-Conditioned Agent Planning
  5. 2026Ask Now, Use Later: Benchmarking the Proactivity Gap in Long-Lived LLM Agents
  6. 2026Towards Natural Personalization: Evaluating Long-Horizon Preference Following in Personalized User-LLM Interactions
  7. 2026Beyond expert users: agents should help users construct preferences, not just elicit them
  8. 2026KnowU-Bench: Towards Interactive, Proactive, and Personalized Mobile Agent Evaluation