mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Interactive Agent for Requirement-Driven Candidate Sourcing

arXiv 2608.23501 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2026cs.SEcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Finding people from a natural-language description (``ML engineers transitioning to research roles in biotech'') is increasingly delegated to LLM agents and framed as information retrieval. We argue that it is fundamentally a requirements engineering task: such a request is an under-determined requirement with implicit constraints, many valid answers, and no acceptance criterion, so useful answers require eliciting, validating, and verifying the requirement before search can matter. We present sys, to our knowledge the first interactive, requirements-driven candidate-sourcing agent (it elicits, validates, retrieves, and verifies a vague people-request into a justified slate through bounded elicitation, workflow templates, a two-stage commit protocol, and bidirectional termination guards) and bench, a benchmark that runs the requirements lifecycle (criteria-anchored validation, multi-model evidence-grounded oracle construction, and cost-aware verification). Across 21 systems and all 691 requirements, sys dominates breadth (100% coverage at 2.5× the yield) and is near-orthogonal to the field, with 90% of the people it returns are surfaced by none of 20 strong LLM-plus-web baselines combined. Beyond breadth, an evidence-grounded judging of every system shows sys recalls the most relevant real people: 0.241 of the union pool, 1.9× the next system, with a bootstrap 95% interval disjoint from every baseline. sys is thus the strongest sourcing engine (the deepest real, reachable candidate pool), while precision-ranking LLMs serve as~complementary verifiers.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 21 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

Builds on

21 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026REAgent: Requirement-Driven LLM Agents for Software Issue Resolution8 Apr
  2. 2024MARE: Multi-Agents Collaboration Framework for Requirements Engineering6 May
  3. 2024RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program Repair25 Mar

Other references · 18

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  4. 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 616
  5. 2024AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvementcited by 272
  6. 2019Asking Clarifying Questions in Open-Domain Information-Seeking Conversationscited by 136
  7. 2018Learning to Ask Good Questions: Ranking Clarification Questions using Neural Expected Value of Perfect Informationcited by 110
  8. 2024Vul-RAG: Enhancing LLM-based Vulnerability Detection via Knowledge-level RAGcited by 67
  9. 2019Requirements Engineering for Machine Learning: Perspectives from Data Scientistscited by 49
  10. 2023Advancing Requirements Engineering through Generative AI: Assessing the Role of LLMscited by 42
  11. 2024Application of LLM Agents in Recruitment: A Novel Framework for Resume Screeningcited by 23
  12. 2024Leveraging LLMs for the Quality Assurance of Software Requirementscited by 15
6 more
  1. 2026DeepFact: Co-Evolving Benchmarks and Agents for Deep Research Factualitycited by 10
  2. 2025LLMREI: Automating Requirements Elicitation Interviews with LLMscited by 8
  3. 2021The State-of-Practice in Requirements Elicitation: An Extended Interview Study at 12 Companiescited by 5
  4. 2025Requirements Elicitation Follow-Up Question Generationcited by 5
  5. 2026ReqElicitGym: An Evaluation Environment for Interview Competence in Conversational Requirements Elicitationcited by 3
  6. 2025Evaluating AI Recruitment Sourcing Tools by Human Preferencecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Agent4RE: A Self-Refining Multi-agent Framework for End-to-End Software Requirements Engineering and Benchmarking
  2. 2026On the Viability of Requirements Generation From Code: An Experience Report ↗
  3. 2024Elicitron: An LLM Agent-Based Simulation Framework for Design Requirements Elicitation
  4. 2026Neuro-Symbolic Agents for Hallucination-Free Requirements Reuse
  5. 2026From Chat to Interview: Agentic Requirements Elicitation with an Experience Ontology
  6. 2025Towards Requirements Engineering for RAG Systems
  7. 2025Goal2Story: A Multi-Agent Fleet based on Privately Enabled sLLMs for Impacting Mapping on Requirements Elicitation
  8. 2026TraceDev: A Traceability-Driven Multi-agent Framework for Requirement-to-Code Development