mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TraceDev: A Traceability-Driven Multi-agent Framework for Requirement-to-Code Development

arXiv 2607.18886 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2026cs.SEcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

In modern software development, the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has made the end-to-end transformation of Natural Language Requirements (NLRs) into executable repository-level code increasingly feasible. However, existing approaches typically rely on simplified instructions (e.g., single-sentence descriptions), failing to reflect complex software development scenarios. Moreover, they lack explicit requirement traceability mechanisms, making it difficult to precisely align and validate generated code against original requirements. To address these limitations, we propose TraceDev, a multi-agent framework for automated software development grounded in use cases that contain multiple functional points and complex semantics. TraceDev employs five role-specific agents, including a Requirement Refiner, Designer, Developer, Tester, and Validator. Notably, the Validator Agent constructs and maintains a heterogeneous traceability graph that links requirements, design models, and code artifacts for interacting with the preceding four agents. The traceability graph maintains consistency across various artifacts and serves as a structured context for efficient memory management, supporting reliable repository-level code generation. We evaluate TraceDev on two widely used datasets (including 125 use cases) compared with two state-of-the-art approaches. On the ETOUR dataset, TraceDev achieves a success rate of 53.63%, outperforming baseline approaches by up to 186.63%. A similar trend is observed on the SMOS dataset, where TraceDev attains a success rate of 56.82%, exceeding baseline approaches by up to 340.80%. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of TraceDev in repository-level code generation from requirements.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 28 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2026.

Builds on

28 of 68 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024CodeTree: Agent-guided Tree Search for Code Generation with Large Language Models7 Nov
  2. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development16 Jul

Other references · 26

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  2. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  3. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  4. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,427
  5. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  6. 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,154
  7. 2023Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 389
  8. 2024CheckEval: A reliable LLM-as-a-Judge framework for evaluating text generation using checklistscited by 87
  9. 2023A Survey on Large Language Models for Software Engineeringcited by 58
  10. 2025Plan and Budget: Effective and Efficient Test-Time Scaling on Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 30
  11. 2025Large Language Models for Code Generation: A Comprehensive Survey of Challenges, Techniques, Evaluation, and Applicationscited by 26
  12. 2024The Current Challenges of Software Engineering in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 21
14 more
  1. 2021Traceability Transformed: Generating more Accurate Links with Pre-Trained BERT Modelscited by 20
  2. 2025RPG: A Repository Planning Graph for Unified and Scalable Codebase Generationcited by 18
  3. 2023Prompts Matter: Insights and Strategies for Prompt Engineering in Automated Software Traceabilitycited by 15
  4. 2024Empowering Agile-Based Generative Software Development through Human-AI Teamworkcited by 12
  5. 2024Deep Learning-based Software Engineering: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 9
  6. 2025Large Language Models (LLMs) for Requirements Engineering (RE): A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 9
  7. 2024Smaller but Better: Self-Paced Knowledge Distillation for Lightweight yet Effective LCMscited by 6
  8. 2025Towards Mitigating API Hallucination in Code Generated by LLMs with Hierarchical Dependency Awarecited by 6
  9. 2024Natural Language Processing for Requirements Traceabilitycited by 5
  10. 2018Leveraging Historical Associations between Requirements and Source Code to Identify Impacted Classescited by 3
  11. 2025From Requirements to Code: Understanding Developer Practices in LLM-Assisted Software Engineeringcited by 3
  12. 2025ARS: Adaptive Reasoning Suppression for Efficient Large Reasoning Language Modelscited by 2
  13. 2025Adopting Use Case Descriptions for Requirements Specification: an Industrial Case Studycited by 1
  14. 2025UserTrace: User-Level Requirements Generation and Traceability Recovery from Software Project Repositoriescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Requirements Development and Formalization for Reliable Code Generation: A Multi-Agent Vision
  2. 2026Agent4RE: A Self-Refining Multi-agent Framework for End-to-End Software Requirements Engineering and Benchmarking
  3. 2026CodeTeam: An LLM-Powered Multi-Agent Framework for Repository-Level Code Generation
  4. 2026WiseSpec: Requirements-Driven Agents for Code Generation
  5. 2026A Unified Issue Resolution Benchmark for Requirement Clarification, Planning, and Code Generation for Coding Agents
  6. 2026Intent-aligned Formal Specification Synthesis via Traceable Refinement
  7. 2026On the Viability of Requirements Generation From Code: An Experience Report ↗
  8. 2026Trust-Aware Multi-Agent Traceability: Confidence-Calibrated Knowledge Graphs for Consistent Software Artifact Management