mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating AI Recruitment Sourcing Tools by Human Preference

arXiv 2504.02463 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2025cs.IR cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study introduces a benchmarking methodology designed to evaluate the performance of AI-driven recruitment sourcing tools. We created and utilized a dataset to perform a comparative analysis of search results generated by leading AI-based solutions, LinkedIn Recruiter, and our proprietary system, Pearch.ai. Human experts assessed the relevance of the returned candidates, and an Elo rating system was applied to quantitatively measure each tool's comparative performance. Our findings indicate that AI-driven recruitment sourcing tools consistently outperform LinkedIn Recruiter in candidate relevance, with Pearch.ai achieving the highest performance scores. Furthermore, we found a strong alignment between AI-based evaluations and human judgments, highlighting the potential for advanced AI technologies to substantially enhance talent acquisition effectiveness. Code and supporting data are publicly available at https://github.com/vslaykovsky/ai-sourcing-benchmark

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 5 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2025.

Builds on

4 of 5 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  4. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.