The State-of-Practice in Requirements Elicitation: An Extended Interview Study at 12 Companies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Context. Requirements engineering remains a discipline that is faced with a large number of challenges, including the implementation of a requirements elicitation process in industry. Although several proposals have been suggested by researchers and academics, little is known of the practices that are actually followed in industry. Objective. We investigate the SoTA with respect to requirements elicitation, examining practitioners' practices. We focus on the techniques, the roles involved, and the challenges associated to the process. Method. We conducted an interview-based survey study involving 24 practitioners from 12 different Swedish IT companies. Results. We found that group interaction techniques, including meetings and workshops, are the most popular type of elicitation techniques that are employed by the practitioners, except in the case of small projects. We noted that customers are frequently involved in the elicitation process, except in the case of market-driven organizations. Technical staff (for example, developers and architects) are more frequently involved in the elicitation process compared to the involvement of business- or strategic staff. Finally, we identified a number of challenges with respect to stakeholders. These challenges include difficulties in understanding and prioritizing their needs. Further, it was noted that requirements instability (i.e., caused by changing needs or priorities) was a predominant challenge. These observations need to be interpreted in the context of the study. Conclusion. The relevant observations regarding the survey participants' experiences should be of interest to the industry; experiences that should be analyzed in the practitioners' context. Researchers may find evidence for the use of academic results in practice, thereby inspiring future theoretical work, as well as further empirical studies in the same area.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025Requirements Elicitation Follow-Up Question Generationcited by 5
- 2026An Interactive Agent for Requirement-Driven Candidate Sourcingcited by 1
- 2021Using Voice and Biofeedback to Predict User Engagement during Product Feedback Interviewscited by 0
- 2026From Chat to Interview: Agentic Requirements Elicitation with an Experience Ontologycited by 0
- 2026AI-assisted Script Management for Requirements Elicitation Interviewscited by 0
- 2026An Interactive Agent for Requirement-Driven Candidate Sourcing24 Aug 2026
- 2026AI-assisted Script Management for Requirements Elicitation Interviews3 Aug 2026
- 2026From Chat to Interview: Agentic Requirements Elicitation with an Experience Ontology7 May 2026
- 2025Requirements Elicitation Follow-Up Question Generation3 Jul 2025
- 2021Using Voice and Biofeedback to Predict User Engagement during Product Feedback Interviews6 Apr 2021