mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automated Trajectory Evaluation for Mobile Agents via Step-Level Consequence Reasoning and Aggregation

arXiv 2608.20797 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating language-guided mobile agents has recently shifted from rule-based to model-based approaches to achieve scalable and automated assessments. However, existing holistic evaluation paradigms process entire trajectories at once, leading to substantial context overload. Moreover, they primarily focus on task completion while overlooking operational safety. To address these limitations, we introduce CRATE, a novel two-stage VLM-as-judge framework for automated mobile agent evaluation that is compatible with both open- and closed-source models. Leveraging a step-level consequence reasoning mechanism, CRATE independently extracts task-relevant visual clues and infers action-conditioned state changes at each step. The resulting step-level textual evidence is then synthesized through trajectory-level aggregation to deliver an evidence-grounded evaluation of task completion. Building upon this evaluation scheme, we further extend CRATE to CRATE-S for operational safety assessment. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness and robustness of both CRATE and CRATE-S. Powered by Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct, CRATE achieves an F1-score of 0.833 on AndroidWorld (outperforming SPA-Bench by 20%), while CRATE-S reaches an F1-score of 0.697 on MobileRisk, demonstrating strong alignment with benchmark ground truths. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CRATE-D580.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2026.

Builds on

15 of 38 references.

References · 15

  1. 2025UI-TARS: Pioneering Automated GUI Interaction with Native Agentscited by 610
  2. 2024SeeClick: Harnessing GUI Grounding for Advanced Visual GUI Agentscited by 567
  3. 2024AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agentscited by 468
  4. 2024Aguvis: Unified Pure Vision Agents for Autonomous GUI Interactioncited by 278
  5. 2024On the Effects of Data Scale on UI Control Agentscited by 194
  6. 2024GUIOdyssey: A Comprehensive Dataset for Cross-App GUI Navigation on Mobile Devicescited by 194
  7. 2024Large Language Model-Brained GUI Agents: A Surveycited by 162
  8. 2024Aria-UI: Visual Grounding for GUI Instructionscited by 140
  9. 2024GUI Agents with Foundation Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 111
  10. 2024AndroidLab: Training and Systematic Benchmarking of Android Autonomous Agentscited by 107
  11. 2024SPA-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for SmartPhone Agent Evaluationcited by 81
  12. 2025A Survey on (M)LLM-Based GUI Agentscited by 62
3 more
  1. 2024MobileSafetyBench: Evaluating Safety of Autonomous Agents in Mobile Device Controlcited by 51
  2. 2025Towards Trustworthy GUI Agents: A Surveycited by 34
  3. 2024Foundations and Recent Trends in Multimodal Mobile Agents: A Surveycited by 31

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PASTABench: Proactive Assessment of Sequential Trajectories for Agent Safety
  2. 2026DynSTEER: Dynamic Stage-wise Trajectory Evaluation and Execution-time Review for Agents
  3. 2026Benchmarking LLM Judges for Mobile Agent Evaluation
  4. 2025OS-Sentinel: Towards Safety-Enhanced Mobile GUI Agents via Hybrid Validation in Realistic Workflows
  5. 2026Long-Horizon Agent Trajectory Attribution: A Unified Benchmark and Fine-Grained Annotation Framework
  6. 2026Claw-Eval: Towards Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents
  7. 2025Say One Thing, Do Another? Diagnosing Reasoning-Execution Gaps in VLM-Powered Mobile-Use Agents
  8. 2026ATBench: A Diverse and Realistic Agent Trajectory Benchmark for Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis